Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 628 2001 SLD 628 2001 PTD 3788 (2000) 241 ITR 546 (2000) 82 TAX 509
Madhya Pradesh High Court
M. C. C. No. 268 of 1993 -decided on 9-02-1999
B.A. KHAN AND N. K., JAIN, JJ
S. K. Pawnekar for the Commissioner. G.M. Chaphekar for the Assessee.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

VS

JAKKO POYRY ENQINEERING

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 9,256,256(2)

Income-tax--Reference---Income deemed to accrue or arise in India---Non-resident engaged as consultant---Amount paid for field study in India and preparation of report in a foreign country---Amount whether taxable under S.9--­Question of law---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.9 & 256(2). The assessee was M a non-resident based in Finland. It was approached by Nepa Mills, a resident, for consultancy services to solve its production and operation problems. An agreement was executed between the two and pursuant thereto, the non-resident assessee sent its consultants for field study who were paid on daily basis, a total amount of $ 35,198. The results of their study were later finalised and prepared in Finland for which $ 24,000 were paid to the assessee under the agreement. The amount was taxed as income by the Income-tax Officer but the Tribunal held that it was not taxable. On an application to direct reference: Held, that the question whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that payment of $ 59,198 had not accrued or arisen in India as fees for technical consultancy in terms of section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was a question of law. JUDGMENT B.A. KHAN, J.---The Revenue has filed this application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, praying for calling for the statement of the case from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal on the following two questions: "(i) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no service has been rendered by the ass6ssee who is a non-resident to a resident in terms of section 9 of the Income-tax Act? (ii) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that payment of $ 69,198 has not accrued or arisen in India as fees for technical consultancy in terms of section 9 of the Income-tax?" It transpires that the assessee is a non-resident based in Finland. It was approached by Nepa Mills, a resident, for consultancy services to solve its production and operation problems. An agreement was executed between the two and pursuant thereto, the non-resident assessee sent it…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492