Case Details

Citation(s)
2000 SLG 1033 2000 SLD 1033 2000 SCMR 1618 2000 SLD 1446 2000 SCMR 1618
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.620-K of 1999, decision dated: 3rd August, 1999.
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, WAJIHUDDIN AHMED AND KAMAL MANSUR ALAM, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD ANSARUL ISLAM QARNI

VS

KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE LTD.

Law:

Section:

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--Ss. 151 & 152---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Petitioner, presently a practising lawyer and Advocate-on-Record used to be member of Stock Exchange when he was removed from the membership---High Court directed that if within one month, or such further time as may be given, the petitioner informs the Court that he has ceased to be an Advocate, then the decree shall include a declaration that he is a "member of the Stock Exchange", otherwise it will only declare that the order of the Directors of Stock Exchange was illegal and ultra vires---Petitioner through his statement informed the High Court that he wanted to continue as a member of Bar Association and to practise as an Advocate and no declaration with regard to his membership of the Stock Exchange was incorporated in the decree in terms of the of the High Court---Contention of the petitioner was that while preparing the decree his letter addressed to the High Court was not appreciated as according to him in the said letter he had clearly opted to continue as a member of the Stock Exchange without doing business and at the same time to continue his legal practice---Validity---Petitioner, in fact, had been allowed two options by the High Court i.e. either to continue as an Advocate or to remain member of the Stock Exchange---Petitioner having opted to continue to practise as an Advocate, no declaration with regard to his membership of the Stock Exchange was incorporated in the decree in terms of the of the High Court---Matter having been finally disposed of by Supreme Court in petitioner's appeal against the contents of the decree by the High Court, fresh application filed by petitioner in the High Court under Ss.151 & 152, C. P. C. for necessary amendment/correction in the decree had no merits and had rightly been dismissed by High Court---Petition for leave to appeal against such order of the High Court was dismissed in circumstances. Muhammad Sharif, Advocate Supreme Court and A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1999. ORDER KAMAL MANSUR ALAM, J.---The petitioner seeks leave to appeal…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492