Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--- ---Art. 19.9 --- Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of --- Scope---Conduct of petitioner'---Relevancy --- Petitioner earlier had chosen to participate in proceedings before the respondent-Authority without any objection and took a chance for a favourable order-.--Order having been passed by Authority against petitioner, he was estopped to raise any such question before High Court--­Conduct of a person invoking jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199 of the Constitution was of vital significance and importance --- All orders, challenged before High Court in Constitutional jurisdiction need not be interfered with--­High Court could decline the relief, even though order impugned could be termed as one without jurisdiction. Abdul Wahab and others V. Habib Ali and others PLD 1969 Lab. 365; Muhammad Sharif and another v. District Judge, Sahiwal and others PLD 1981 SC 571;. Haji Muhammad Asghar v. Malik Shah Muhammad Awan and another PLD 1986 SC 542 and Muhammad Hussain Jaffari v. Mst. Maryam Bibi and 2 others 1985-CLC 451 ref. JUDGMENT Order dated 12-11-1983 of the learned District Judge, Faisalabad, whereby, hel4isinisged the revision filed by the petitioner, against order dated 13-1-1983, of the Chairman, Union Council No.212, Faisalabad, has been challenged, through this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution. 2. An application alleging non-payment of Rs. 1,400 was sent to Chairman, Union Council No.212, Chak No.38, Faisalabad at the instance of respondent . No.3 by. his brother, who was: serving in Pakistan Army. The petitioner entered, appearance before him. During the course of proceedings it was agreed by the parties that the matter will be decided on oath of any of the persons. nominated with the consent of the parties, namely, Ali Nawaz, Imam Din, Wajid Ali Khan and Fazal, Elahi. This oath was to be taken in. the mosque On Holy Qur'an in the presence of the parties. It was agreed that if the petitioner was unable to comply with the same he would pay Rs. 1,420 to the present respondent No.3. This undertaking was not honoured by the petitioner, as a result whereof, he was found liable to pay Rs. 1,420 to…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492