Case Details

Citation(s)
1999 SLG 946 1999 SLD 946 1999 PLC 471
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Revision Application No.SUK-32 of 1999, decision dated: 12-04-1999.
DR. TANZILURRAHMAN, CHAIRMAN

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

QADRI & Co. BAGGING & LOADING CONTRACTOR through Proprietor

VS

ENGRO CHEMICAL BAGGING & LOADING CONTRACTOR MAZDOOR UNION

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-------S. 34---Grievance of individual workers ---C.B.A. filing application under S.34, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969---Maintainability--­Union/Collective Bargaining Agent was not competent to file application under S. 34, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 in its own name seeking redress of grievance of individual workers. Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd. v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and 2 others 1984 PLC 1359; Karachi Pipe Mills Employees' Union, Karachi v. Karachi Pipe Mills Ltd., Karachi 1992 SCMR 36 and 1999 SCMR 230 ref. Mahmood A. Ghani, Representative for Applicant. Abdul Jabbar, General Secretary for Respondent-Union Date of hearing: 14th April, 1999. JUDGMENT This is a revision application under section 38(3-a), of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, filed by the applicant company against the respondent union, against the order, dated 1-3-1999, passed by the learned Labour Court at Sukkur. 2. Briefly facts of the case are that an application under section 34 of the I.R.0, 1969 was filed by the respondent union, in the Labour Court at Sukkur in July, 1998 claiming reinstatement of 13 individual workers of the applicant company with back benefits. Notice of the said application was served on the applicant company on 28-7-1998. Immediately, thereafter, the applicant company filed its reply statement with legal objections. An application was also filed alongwith the said reply statement on 30-7-1998 praying for the hearing of the legal objections first without proceeding with the case on aver its. The said legal objections were enumerated in para. l of the said reply statement as ' A' , ' B' , ' C' , ' D' and ' E' . The learned Presiding Officer heard the said application and passed an order dated 1-3-1999 whereby the learned Presiding Officer was pleased to dismiss the said application on the ground that the objections, raised in the said application, are mixed questions of facts and law. The above revision application was filed in this Court on 1-4-1999 which came up in Katcha Peshi on 2-4-1999 and was admitted to regular hearing. 3. To appreciate the order, impugned in this Tribunal, it seems…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492