| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1999 SLG 947 1999 SLD 947 1999 PLC 485 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Revision Application No.HYD-227 of 1998, decision dated: 30-04-1999.
DR. TANZILURRAHMAN, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Revision Application No.HYD-227 of 1998, decision dated: 30-04-1999.
DR. TANZILURRAHMAN, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
DISTRICT MANAGER, SINDH ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BADIN DEPOT.
VS
MUHAMMAD ISHAQ
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)-------S. 25-A---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.Os. 1(b) & 12(3)---Permanent status of workman--- Determination---Termination of permanent workman---Evidence on record had proved that employee had served employer continuously, without any break, for eight months---Although as per appointment letter appointment of employee was for sixty days, but such period of sixty days was extended several times, by merely stating in appointment letter that appointment of employee was for sixty days---Such treatment would not come in way of employee to attain status of a permanent workman as total period of service of employee had exceeded ninety days and his work was of a permanent nature---Employee who had satisfactorily completed probationary period of three months, had attained status of permanent workman and he was entitled to a notice under S.O. 12(3) of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968., (b) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)--- ----S.Os. 1(b) & 12(3)---Termination of permanent workman---Where employee had attained status of permanent workman, his services would not be terminated nor would he be removed, retrenched, discharged or dismissed from service except by an order in writing which would explicitly state reasons for action taken against employee. Qareebur Rehman v. Mehran Bottlers 1993 PLC 154 and Munir Khan v: Presiding Officer, Vth Sindh Labour Court, Karachi 1998 PLC 192 ref. Devdas M. Udeshi, Law Officer for Applicant. Sheikh Wahid Bux, Representative for Respondent JUDGMENT This is a revision application under section 38(3-a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, against the order, dated 14-5-1998, passed by the learned Labour Court No.VI at Hyderabad in Grievance Application No.75 of 1996. 2. The respondent was appointed by the applicant on different dates for different periods. Mr. Devdas and Wahid Bux for applicant and respondent respectively have filed a joint statement in writing, signed by them in respect thereof,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492