| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2000 SLG 581 2000 SLD 581 2000 PLC 199 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos.489 and 490 of 1994, decision dated: 20-05-1999, hearing DATE : 13-05-1999
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE SH. IJAZ NISAR, JUSTICE KAMAL MANSURS ALAM, JUSTICE
Farooq Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate on-Record (absent) for
Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos.489 and 490 of 1994, decision dated: 20-05-1999, hearing DATE : 13-05-1999
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE SH. IJAZ NISAR, JUSTICE KAMAL MANSURS ALAM, JUSTICE
Farooq Zaman Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Sh. Masood Akhtar, Advocate on-Record (absent) for
Respondents.
IZHAR AHMED KHAN and others
VS
PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and others
Law:
Section:
(a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) S.O. 1(b)(c) Constitution of Pakistan '(1973) Art185 Industrial dispute Permanent workman and temporary workman' Determination Test Nature of work on which a workman was employed would determine whether workman was permanent or temporary If work was of a permanent nature likely to last for a period of more than nine month's, workman employed on such a work, who had successfully completed probationary period of three months would be deemed to be a "permanent workman" If nature of work was temporary and was likely to be finished within a period of nine months, then workman employed on such work would be deemed to be "temporary workman" Mere fact that work of a temporary nature continued beyond nine months, would not make a workman employed on such work a permanent workman as expression "likely to be finished within a period not exceeding nine months" used in definition clause of S.O. 1(b)(c) of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, would admit within its scope that a work of temporary nature, could in certain circumstances, stretch beyond nine months Evidence on record had shown that post against which appointment was made was of permanent nature though in appointment letter same was described as purely temporary and that period of employment continued beyond period of nine months Employees in circumstances would be deemed to be "permanent workmen" the within the definition given in S.O. 1(b) of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. Pakistan International Airlines v. Sindh Labour Court No.5 PLD 1980 SC 323; Messrs Pakistan National Produce Company Ltd., Shikarpur v. Nawab Ali Budhani and another 1990 PLC 585 and Abdul Hameed Kiranvi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others 1990 PLC 213 ref. (b) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) S.O.1(b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), S. 38 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 185 & 199 Permanent nature of work Determination Labour Appellate Tribunal onβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492