Case Details

Citation(s)
1998 SLG 461 1998 SLD 461 1998 PTD 3468 (1999) 79 TAX 93 1999 PTCL 252
Quetta High Court
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 132, 133, 134, 135, 147, 149 and 150 of 1998, decision dated: 18-06-1998, hearing DATE : 11-06-1998
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY AND RAJA FAYYAZ AHMAD, JJ
Zahid Alvi, Akhtar Ali Mehmood, H. Shakil Ahmed and Ayaz Sawati for Petitioners (in all Petitions). Advocate-General, Balochistan, Ashraf Khan Tanoli and Pervaiz Khan Tanoli for
Respondents (in all Petitions).

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax

VS

MEWARA CONSTRUCTIONS

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Section: 2(24),15,50(1)(5)&53

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss.2(24), 15, 500)(5) & 53---Government of Balochistan Notification No.5-182/81 (PLGB) ACIV, dated 8th April, 1982---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Income---Demand of octroi after computing and adding 5 % advance income-tax, in value of goods---Validity---Petitioners imported unserviceable ships. from abroad for purpose of dismantling/scrapping---After dismantling ships when scrap thereof was presented at octroi post, respondent/octroi contractor intended to add 5 % advance income-tax in value for purpose of charging octroi on scrap of ships considering same to be one of components for determining the value to collect octroi---Income-tax was not to be recovered on the goods, but it was to be charged on the personal income of the importer at the time of submitting the income-tax returns according to S.53 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Not necessary that amount of advance income-tax temporarily recovered by Customs Collector should be finally deducted because if on filing of income-tax return, importer could make out a case that income-tax could not be recovered from him, for any lawful reason, then already temporarily deducted amount was to be returned by the Department--¬Such tax the fate of which was yet to be determined in subsequent proceedings by Income-tax Department, could not be considered to be the payment of final tax---Advance income-tax paid by importer on the value of goods calculated by Customs Collector, subject to final adjustment of income-tax by concerned Department, could not be considered, one of the components of value or ad valour cost for the purpose of recovery of octroi---Respondent /Octroi Contractor, in circumstances, had no lawful authority to treat advance income-tax to be one of components of value of imported goods---Directions were issued to respondent/Octroi Contractor to refund proportionate amount of octroi charged from petitioner. PLD 1995 SC 423 and 1997 MLD 3142 ref. JUDGMENT IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.---In Constitutional Petitions 132 to 135, 147, 149 and 150 of 1998, petitioners have challenged, the demand of respondent-Messrs Shehbaz…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492