| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2000 SLG 231 2000 SLD 231 2000 PTD 622 (1998) 233 ITR 949 |
Calcutta High Court
I.T.C. No.52 of 1996, decision dated: 17-10-1997
R. C. LAHOTI AND, J. K. MEHRA, JJ
R. D. Jolly with Ms. Prem Lata Bansal for the Commissioner. G. C. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Tarim Dua for the Assessee.
I.T.C. No.52 of 1996, decision dated: 17-10-1997
R. C. LAHOTI AND, J. K. MEHRA, JJ
R. D. Jolly with Ms. Prem Lata Bansal for the Commissioner. G. C. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Tarim Dua for the Assessee.
COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax
VS
N. K. RAJGARHIA
Law: Income Tax Act, 1961
Section: 256,256(2)
(a) Income-tax-----Reference---Question of law---Capital or revenue expenditure ---Assessee deriving income from export of spare parts and commission from Indian and foreign authorities---Deduction claimed on account of commission paid to G---Tribunal finding that G had helped assessee in obtaining better price and commission paid to G in accordance with memorandum of understanding reached between assessee and G---Assessee receiving repeated orders for supply of detergent but no commission paid to G on that account or in respect of every contract---Both assessee and G free to compete with each other---Tribunal finding that expenditure by way of commission to ward off competition in individual transaction and leaving competitor surviving in field is only revenue expenditure---Finding of Tribunal is finding of fact---No question of law arises for reference---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256(2). (b) Income-tax--- ----Reference---Question of law---Business expenditure---Assessee receiving commission for sale of textile machinery imported from USSR against which assessee paying commission to A---A introducing assessee to P mills which was purchasing textile machinery on assessees persuasion---P mills purchasing machinery from USSR---Tribunal finding exchange of regular correspondence between assessee and A showing role played by A in securing orders to assessee---A confirming receipt of commission from assessee and payment made to A by account payee cheques or drafts---Bank confirming transactions between assessee and A on inquiries from revenue---Commission paid to A only, one-fifth of total commission receipts of assessee---A was an independent entity and was filing Income Tax Returns---Tribunal deleting disallowance of commission -paid to A---Finding of Tribunal finding of fact and no question of law arises for reference---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S. 256(2). It is well-settled that whether an expenditure was incurred or not, is a question falling within the domain of facts. Whether such expenditure is allowable as a deduction or not and how the nature of such expenditure is to be classified under the relevant legal provision is a question of law. The…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492