Case Details

Citation(s)
2000 SLG 243 2000 SLD 243 2000 PTD 684 (1998) 232 ITR 530
Kerala High Court
Income-tax Reference No. 76 of 1994, decision dated: 10-01-1997
MRS. K. K. USHA AND G. SIVARAJAN, JJ
P.K.R. Menon and N.R.K. Nair for the Commissioner. C.N. Ramachandran Nair for the Assessee.

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax

VS

MIDLAND RUBBERS AND PRODUCE CO. LTD

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 31,37

Income-tax---Business expenditure---Current repairs---Disallowance of expenditure---Expenditure on repairs and insurance of cars and jeeps is covered by S.31---Section 37(3A) is not applicable---Expenditure on repair cannot be disallowed---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss.31 & 37. Expenditure incurred by the assessee as repair charges of car and jeep would come directly under section 31 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 37(1) takes in cases which are not covered by sections 30 to 36, and the non obstante clause in section 37(3A) does not have the effect of bringing the provisions contained under section 31 also within the purview of section 37(1). Hence, expenditure in respect of repairs and insurance of motor car or jeep cannot be included in the expenditure incurred on running and maintenance of motor cars for the purpose of restriction under section 37(3A). Repairs are governed by section 31 and taxes are regulated under section 30 and such expenditure cannot be construed as running and maintenance expenditure of motor cars described under section 37(3A). CIT v. A. V.. Thomas & Co. Ltd. (1997) 225 ITR 29 (Ker.) ref. JUDGMENT MRS. K. K. USHA, J.---This is a reference under section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench, at the instance of the revenue arising out of the order of the Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 737/Cock of 1987, which relate to the assessment year 1985-86. The following is the question referred for the opinion of this Court: "Whether, on he facts and in the circumstances of the case, should not the repairs to car and jeep be included for computing the disallowance under section 37(3A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" The fact of the case are as follows: The assessee, a company, had incurred certain expenditure for the repair of motor car and jeep for the assessment year 1985-86. In the return the assessee computed disallowance under section 37(3A) but claimed that no disallowance can be made on these repair charges on the ground that section 37(3A) has no application. The Income-tax Officer took the view that section 37(3A) is applicable and rejected the claim of the assessee. The contention…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492