| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1999 SLG 410 1999 SLD 410 1999 SCMR 1845 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.898-L of 1997, decision dated: 5-08-1998. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 26-6-1997 passed by the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur in Civil Revision No.229/97/BWP)
RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN AND CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, JJ
Rana Abdul Raheem, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmed, Kdv6cate_on-Re; cord for Petitioner. Ehsan Ullah Lilla, Advocate Supreme Court, Ehsan-ul-Haq Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Civil Petition No.898-L of 1997, decision dated: 5-08-1998. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 26-6-1997 passed by the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur in Civil Revision No.229/97/BWP)
RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN AND CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, JJ
Rana Abdul Raheem, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmed, Kdv6cate_on-Re; cord for Petitioner. Ehsan Ullah Lilla, Advocate Supreme Court, Ehsan-ul-Haq Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court with Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondent
Rana MUMTAZ AHMED NOON
VS
MUHAMMAD JAVED KHAN -
Law:
Section:
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--O. XXXVII, Rr. 2 & 3 --- Suit for recovery of amount --- Leave to appear and defend suit --- Defendant who bad sought leave to appear and defend suit, had failed to disclose any plausible defence or even specific question of law or fact which required to be tried or investigated --- Application to appear and defend suit, was rightly dismissed by Trial Court and High Court in circumstances. Messrs National Security Insurance Company Limited and others v Messrs Hoechet Pakistan Limited and others 1992 SCMR 718 ref. ORDER CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, J. ---Respondent- Muhammad Javed Khan filed suit under Order, XXXVII of the. Code of Civil Procedure against the petitioner-seeking recovery of a total sum of Rs. 13,94,500 on -the basis of the cheques issued by the petitioner./defendant in favour of the plaintiff/respondent. Petitioner made an application under rule 3, of Order XXXVII (ibid) to obtain leave to appear and defend the case on 7-3-1997. His averments were that he has been served that the suit is false, without any basis and against facts, that he intends to produce evidence in support of his contention and defence in the exercise of his legal right and that, otherwise, he shall suffer irreparable loss. In reply to petitioner's application the other side resisted the same on the ground that the basis of the suit being the cheques issued by the defendant which were dishonoured, the application : of the petitioner is sans reference to any plausible defence whatsoever, therefore, the same is liable to be dismissed. 2. The learned District Judge, Bahawalpur, declined petitioner's request vide his order dated 6-6-1997,holding that the same ".. does not disclose any plausible defence, or even specific question of law, or fact which requires to be tried or investigated. The affidavit onβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492