| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1965 SLG 453 1965 SLD 453 1965 AIR 1213 1965 SCR 780 |
Supreme Court of India
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 830 of 1963. Appeal by special leave from the and decree dated March 3, 1960 of the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 3 of 1956.
SHAH, J.C.
G. S. Pathak and S. P. Varma, for the appellants. O.P. Rana, for the respondents.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 830 of 1963. Appeal by special leave from the and decree dated March 3, 1960 of the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 3 of 1956.
SHAH, J.C.
G. S. Pathak and S. P. Varma, for the appellants. O.P. Rana, for the respondents.
M/S. JAIPURIA BROTHERS CO.
VS
. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH A OTHERS
Law:
Section:
JUDGMENT: K. Srinivasan and R. Gopalakrishnan, for the intervener. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Shah J. The appellants public limited Company--having its registered office at Calcutta, was, with effect from October 5, 1946, appointed sole agent for sale of goods manufactured by the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Company Ltd. On March 20, 1952, the Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur issued a notice under s. 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 calling upon the appellant Company to file a return of its turnover for the assessment year 1948-49 on the ground that the turnover had escaped assessment. On March 31, 1952, the Sales Tax Office.- made a "best " assessment and determined the taxable turnover of the appellant Company, at Rs. 50 lakhs for the year 1948-49 and determined the appropriate tax liability. In the appeal to the Judge (Appeals) Sales Tax, the order passed by the Sales Tax Officer, was set aside, that authority holding that the appellant Company was not a dealer within the meaning of s. 2(c) of the Act. But the order of the appellate authority was set aside by the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax, by order dated March 28, 1955 and the case was remanded to the Sales Tax Officer for "fresh assessment". In the view of the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax, it was necessary to determine "the ownership of the goods at the time of their sale". The Sales Tax Officer then issued a notice calling, upon the appellant Company to produce its books of account and other relevant documents on July 23, 1955 for the purpose of assessment for the year 1948-49. The appellant Company contended that as the original assessment under s. 21 had been set aside by the Judge (Revisions) Sales Tax, no proceeding in connection with that assessment was pending and re-assessment was barred because more than three year had elapsed since the end of the year of assessment. The Sales Tax Officer rejected the contention of the appellant Company and insisted that the books of account and other documents be produced as directed earlier. The appellant Company then petitioned on September 2, 1955 to the High Court of Allahabad under Art. 226 of the Constitution for a writ in the nature of prohibition…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492