| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1998 SLG 1199 1998 SLD 1199 1998 SCMR 133 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.38 of 1996, decision dated: 5-11-1997
MUHAMMAD BASHIR, JEHANGIRI AND SH. RIAZ AHMAD, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.38 of 1996, decision dated: 5-11-1997
MUHAMMAD BASHIR, JEHANGIRI AND SH. RIAZ AHMAD, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SHER ZAMAN
VS
Mst. NAWAB KHATOON and 7 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Land Reforms Regulation. 1972 (MLR 115)--Para. 25---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Ss.3, 5 & 14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Petition for leave to appeal filed beyond period of limitation---Petitioner's entitlement to extension in limitation- --Petitioner's constitutional petition having been dismissed on 15-5-1995, he filed petition for leave to appeal on 16-1-1996,---Intervening proceedings being incompetent could not provide extension in limitation---Record showed that even at the time of presentation of application for copies on 20-12-1995, petition for leave to appeal was barred by time---Petition for leave to appeal even on that ground would stand dismissed. Mst. Karim Bibi and others v. Hussain Bakhsh and another PLD 1984 SC 344 and Muhammad Abdullah v. Deputy Settlement Commissioner, Circle-I, Lahore PLD 1985 SC 107 ref. (b) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Art. 31---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Alleged admission by plaintiff during cross-examination---Effect--Such admission being out of context and belied by earlier stance of pre-emptor was of no consequence--Where finding of all the three forums in revenue hierarchy was concurrent on question of fact, such finding by lower forums coupled with that of High Court would not warrant interference in the same---Leave to appeal to Supreme Court was refused. Muhammad. Zaman and 10 others v. Muhammad Ramzan Khan 1993 SCMR 197 rel. (c) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115)--- ----Para. 25---Suit for pre-emption by tenant on basis that land in question comprised in his tenancy---Correction of Khasra Girdawari during pendency of suit---Validity---Proceedings under pre-emption suit being of judicial nature, correction of Khasra Girdawari being an executive act (meant only for fiscal record) any such exercise on administrative side would amount to interference with course of justice. Muhammad Safdar Ali Iqbal v. Sher Muhammad and 2 others 1980 CLC 520 rel. Muhammad Fayyaz Ahmed Khawaja, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Muhammad Ghani, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mehr Khan Malik, Advocate-on-Record…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492