Law:

Section:

Civil service------- Adverse remarks---Expunction---Adverse remarks against civil servant which were sought to be expunged, were based on the personal knowledge of the Reporting Officer as well as Countersigning Officer under whom civil servant had worked in major part of the relevant year---Civil servant despite his best efforts, was not in a position to raise any technical objection against remarks awarded to him---Reporting Officer was the best judge for the assessment of the performance of civil servant under whose immediate supervision he worked during the relevant year---Service record of civil servant also revealed that disciplinary cases were initiated against civil servant during year in question which were indicative of the fact that adverse remarks awarded to him were well-founded which fact was also confirmed by Countersigning Officer who had specifically mentioned that civil servant had proved himself to be untrustworthy---Reporting Officer had pointed out not only weak points of civil servant, but had also mentioned in pen-picture that he was intellectual, intelligent, hardworking, which showed that Reporting Officer had given quite independent assessment of the performance of civil servant during the year in question---Adverse remarks against civil servant being fully justified, same could not be expunged. S.M.A. Wahidi for Appellant. Khalid Abbas Khan, Federal Counsel for Respondents. Abdul Hafeez, DAMAG and Saleem Raza, Accountant, M.A.G. Office. Mahmood Ali, DAD, F&A. NLC, D.Rs. Date of hearing: 6th February, 1996. JUDGMENT NOOR MUHAMMAD MAGSI (MEMBER).---The appellant who is working as Assistant Estate Officer (Accounts) in the Estate Office, Islamabad has filed this appeal for expunction of adverse remarks recorded in his A.C.R. for the year 1990 which was conveyed to him on 15-8-1991. On receipt of the copy of the A.C.R. containing adverse remarks, the appellant represented to respondent No. 1 on 26-8-1991 which was ultimately rejected vide order dated 28-11-1995. 2. We have heard the parties. It has been argued by the Counsel for the appellant that the adverse remarks recorded in his A.C.R. for the year 1991 are not based on facts and…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492