| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1997 SLG 238 1997 SLD 238 1997 PTD 2075 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
I.T.A. No.2700/LB of 1995, decision dated: 3rd August, 1995
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BAJWA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SYED MUMTAZ ALAM GILLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Rustam Jee, F.C.A. and Naveed Haider, A.C.A. for Appellant. Haji Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent
I.T.A. No.2700/LB of 1995, decision dated: 3rd August, 1995
IFTIKHAR AHMAD BAJWA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SYED MUMTAZ ALAM GILLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Rustam Jee, F.C.A. and Naveed Haider, A.C.A. for Appellant. Haji Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 13&88&80C(5)readwishThirdSched.,R.3(2),2 3,24
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss. 13 & 80-C (5)---Deemed income---Addition---Presumptive tax --¬Validity---Assessee returned income worked out under normal law--¬Assessing Officer relying upon S.80-C(5) read with S.13(l) (aa) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 assessed income on his own---Difference of both returned and assessed incomes was added back---Held, S.13, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 comes into play only when any credit had been detected and assessee was required to explain, but in the instant case S.80-C(5) of the Ordinance had been made function of calculation which was not in consonance with letter and spirit of law---Assessing Officer had detected nothing---Income-tax Officer worked out income imputable to supplies taxable under S.80-C and charged them to tax under S.13---Such action was beyond scope of S.80-C(5) and amounted to putting cart before horse---Sales and purchases were accepted by ,Assessing Officer---Neither inflation in expenses nor suppression of any item of income was suspected by Assessing Officers---No hint of unexplained income was given on record--¬Section 13 was invoked in round about manner---Assessing Officer applied S.80-C(5) on basis of notional figure---Addition under S.80-C(5) read with S.13 was thus ordered to be deleted. (b) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss.23 & 24---Addition---Disallowance of expenses for provision of pension in anticipation of privatization---Assessee objected to provision of pension in anticipation of privatization--Provision was based-on actual valuation for meeting pension obligation on impending privatization---Held, provision for meeting obligations which may or may not arise was held to be inadmissible---Added amount in question would indeed be admissible as and when privatisation took place. (c) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- --.-Ss.88 & 80-C (5) read wish Third Sched., R.3(2)- -Addition---Shift depreciation allowance---Assessing Officer allowed extraordinary shift depreciation allowance with reference to member of days daring which machinery had been in operation---No exception could be taken to such course. (d) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492