Case Details

Citation(s)
1998 SLG 1533 1998 SLD 1533 1998 PLC 1043
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 584 and 586 of 1995, decision dated: 18-11-1996. (On appeal from the judgments dated 17-7-1995 and 18-7-1995 Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad passed in Appeals Nos.271(R) and 273(R) of 1995).
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI AND IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD SALEEMII, STENOGRAPHER

VS

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division and others

Law:

Section:

Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)-------S. 9---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)---Promotion--­Entitlement to promotion and specified pay---Petitioner appeared in seniority list at Serial No. 16---Petitioner admitted that none of his juniors had been promoted---Service Tribunal was justified in dismissing petitioner's appeal--­Petitioner was also claiming special pay of Rs.150 instead of Rs.120--­Service Tribunal had refused to grant relief to petitioner on the ground that in earlier appeal filed by petitioner he had claimed Rs.120 as special pay which was allowed to him---Petitioner having claimed Rs.120 per month as special pay and same having been granted to him it was not open to him to re-agitate the same matter. again---Judgment of Service Tribunal did not suffer from any infirmity so as to justify interference by Supreme Court--­Leave to appeal to Supreme Court was refused in circumstances. Petitioner in person. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 18th November, 1996. ORDER SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.---Both the abovementioned two petitions are filed by Muhammad Saleem-II a Stenographer of Establishment Division to call in question two separate judgments of Federal Service Tribunal dated 17-7-1995 rendered in two Service Appeals filed by him. 2. In the first 'case the petitioner's grievance before the learned Tribunal was that he was not considered for promotion as a Private Secretary (B-17). The learned Tribunal on the basis of the evidence before it came to the conclusion that the name of the petitioner appeared in the seniority list at serial No. 16 while private respondents in the appeal were all senior to him. We…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492