| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1965 SLG 345 1965 SLD 345 (1965) 56 ITR 114 |
Bombay High Court
MISC. APPLICATION No. 143 OF 1963, MARCH 19, 1964
Y.S. TAMBE AND S.P. KOTWAL, JJ
N.A. Palkhivala and S.P. Mehta for the Petitioner. G.N. Joshi for the
Respondent
MISC. APPLICATION No. 143 OF 1963, MARCH 19, 1964
Y.S. TAMBE AND S.P. KOTWAL, JJ
N.A. Palkhivala and S.P. Mehta for the Petitioner. G.N. Joshi for the
Respondent
National Rayon Corpn. Ltd
v.
G.R. Bahmani
Law: Income Tax Act, 1922
Section: 35
Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [Corresponding to section 35 of Indian Income-tax Act, 1922], read with Schedule I, Part II, Para D of the Finance Act, 1957 - Rectification - Of mistakes apparent from record - Assessment year 1957-58 - Whether a mistake becomes a mistake apparent from record when it is a glaring, obvious or self-evident mistake and a mistake which has to be discovered by a long drawn process of reasoning or examining arguments on points where there may conceivably be two opinions, it cannot be said to be a mistake or error which is apparent from record - Held, yes - By Finance Act, 1956, a scheme had been enacted which was obviously intended for purpose of acting as a deterrent on certain companies declaring dividends in excess of 6 per cent. of its capital investment - A rebate was granted to certain companies which satisfied certain conditions mentioned therein. Amount of rebate which was so calculated for purpose of reducing amount of super-tax was liable to be reduced if that company declared dividends in excess of 6 per cent. of its paid-up capital in relevant previous year - By the Finance Act, 1957, a scheme was further enlarged in respect of reductions in amount of rebate - Held, yes - During assessment year 1956-57 assessee company declared nil income while declared dividend in excess of statutory limit of 6 per cent of capital investment - Assessment for this year was duly recomputed - For next year i.e. assessment year 1957-58, there was positive income - (In computing corporation tax rebate was to be allowed to assessee-company - While computing rebate an amount was deducted therefrom on account of declaration of dividend in excess of 6 per cent for this year and assessment was completed - Subsequently ITO initiated rectification proceeding for assessment year 1957-58 on ground that an amount was also to be deducted from rebate as carry forward unabsorbed deduction on account of excess declaration of dividend in earlier year i.e., assessment year 1956-57 - He, subsequently, passed rectification order - Having regard to scheme of Finance Act of 1956 and sub-clause (a) of clause (i) of the second proviso of Schedule D of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492