| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1998 SLG 962 1998 SLD 962 1998 SCMR 2648 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 1488 of 1997, decision dated: 29-04-1998. (On appeal from the judgment dated 30-7-1996 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in R.S.A. No.223/1984)
IRSHAD HASAN KHAN AND CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, JJ
Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants. Nemo for
Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 1488 of 1997, decision dated: 29-04-1998. (On appeal from the judgment dated 30-7-1996 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in R.S.A. No.223/1984)
IRSHAD HASAN KHAN AND CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, JJ
Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants. Nemo for
Respondents
SHER MUHAMMAD through Legal Heir and others
VS
ALLAH RAKHA and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)--S.15---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Suit for pre-emption filed by plaintiff on basis of relationship was decreed by all the Courts below including the High Court---Validity---Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether without tangible proof regarding relationship of vendors with predecessor of pre-emptors, his superior right of pre-emptor over land in question, could lawfully be accepted; whether appellate forums without making any comments or giving reasons, could lawfully reject appeals and disregard evidence available on record; whether documentary evidence showing glaring , difference about parentage of vendor or plaintiffs could be consciously ignored or omitted without assigning reasons; whether or not appellate forums were bound to thoroughly re-evaluate evidence brought on record and rectify defects of Trial Court; and whether or not conclusions of High Court were contradictory to conclusions in identical matter culminating in petition for leave to appeal in another case. (b) Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913)--- ----S.15---Decree in suit for pre-emption as affirmed by the High Court--Validity---Appellate forums had not thoroughly re-evaluated evidence on record and failed to rectify defects stated in of Trial Court- --Conclusions drawn by High Court were contradictory to its own finding in the matter which was brought before Supreme Court and was dismissed for non-prosecution by separate order---Material on record clearly indicated that predecessor-in-interest of plaintiffs had no superior right of pre-emption ---Impugned and decree passed by High Court was set aside and suit for pre-emption dismissed in circumstances. Pir Bakhsh represented by his legal heirs and others v. The Chairman, Allotment Committee and others PLD 1987 SC 145 ref. JUDGMENT CH. MUHAMMAD ARIF, J.---In this pre-emption matter leave was granted against the judgment, dated 30th July, 1996, passed by a learned Judge in Chambers of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Regular Second Appeal No.223 of 1984. Leave grant order dated 26-I 1-1997, reads thus:-- "This petition is directed against judgment, dated 30th July, 1996…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492