| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1999 SLG 842 1999 SLD 842 1999 PLC 239 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No. 30 of 1993, decision dated: 15-12-1993. (On appeal from the order of the High Court dated 22-4-1993 in Writ Petition No. 44 of 1992).
SARDAR SAID MUHAMMAD KHAN, C.J. AND BASHARAT AHMAD SHAIKH, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeal No. 30 of 1993, decision dated: 15-12-1993. (On appeal from the order of the High Court dated 22-4-1993 in Writ Petition No. 44 of 1992).
SARDAR SAID MUHAMMAD KHAN, C.J. AND BASHARAT AHMAD SHAIKH, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN
VS
AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY and 4 others
Law:
Section:
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974)-------S. 44---University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1985, Ss. 10(2) & 38---Writ petition, competency of---Petitioner/civil servant who was dismissed from service after holding enquiry against him on charge of corruption, had challenged order of his dismissal directly filing writ petition against his dismissal---Writ petition was objected to on ground that same was not competent because adequate alternate remedies in form of appeal, review and revision were available to petitioner/civil servant under relevant Rules--Order dismissing petitioner/civil servant from service was passed by Assistant Registrar and Vice-Chancellor who was Chairman of Syndicate, was Appellate Authority under S. 38 of University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1985 and Rules framed thereunder---Order of dismissal no doubt, had shown that Vice-Chancellor had also agreed with recommendations made by Inquiry Officer, but that itself was not sufficient to conclude that appeal before Syndicate of which Vice-Chancellor was Chairman, would have been a futile exercise---Mere fact that Vice Chancellor agreed with report of Inquiry Officer, would also not render provisions regarding appeal to Syndicate as nugatory---Petitioner/civil servant having failed to avail adequate alternate remedy of appeal before Vice-Chancellor who was Chairman of Syndicate, his writ petition was rightly dismissed being incompetent. Novelty Enterprises Limited, Tariqabad, Mirpur v. Deputy Collector, Excise and Taxation/Sales Tax Officer 1993 CLC 1165; Nek Muhammad v. Roda PLD 1986 SC (AJ&K) 23; Messrs Haroon Brothers v. Drugs Registration Board 1992 CLC 1017; Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mirpur v. Muhammad Siddique PLD 1985 SC (AJ&K) 56; The Murree Brewery Co. Ltd. v. Pakistan through the Secretary to Government of Pakistan, Works Division PLD 1972 SC 279 and Abdul Rehman v. Incometax Officer, Mirpur Circle 1993 SCR 186 ref. Ghulam Mustafa Mughal, Advocate for Appellant Sh. Abdul Aziz, Advocate for Respondents Date of hearing: 8th December, 1993. JUDGMENT SARDAR SAID MUHAMMAD KHAN, C.J.---This appeal has been directed against the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492