| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1999 SLG 367 1999 SLD 367 1999 PTD 2619 (1997) 228 ITR 234 |
Madhya Pradesh High Court
M. C. C. No. 223 of 1991, decision dated: 11-03-1996
A. R. TIWARI AND N. K., JAIN, JJ
D. D. Vyas for the Commissioner
M. C. C. No. 223 of 1991, decision dated: 11-03-1996
A. R. TIWARI AND N. K., JAIN, JJ
D. D. Vyas for the Commissioner
COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax
VS
H. H. MAHARANI PRABHA RAJYALAXMI
Law: Income Tax Act, 1961
Section: 256
Income-tax----Reference---Question decided by High Court cannot be referred--¬Pendency of special leave petition before Supreme Court does not change position---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.256. An issue decided by the High Court cannot be referred. The mere fact that a special leave petition has been filed and .is pending against the, decision does not give rise to a question of law. C.W.T. v. Usha Devi (Smt.) (1990) 183 ITR 75 (MP) and Ganga Cut Piece Centre v. CIT (1997) 225 ITR 839 (MP), fol. Held, that the question whether the capital gains accrued was decided in CIT v. H. H. Maharaja Sahib Shri Lokendra Singhji (1986) 162 ITR 93 (MP). Mere pendency of special leave petition against the decision did not give rise to a referable question of law. CIT v. H. H. Maharaja Sahib Shri Lokendra Singhji (1986) 162 .ITR 93;(MP) ref. JUDGMENT A.R. TIWARI, J.---The applicant -(Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal,. has filed this application, under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"), seeking a direction to-the Tribunal to state the case and refer the proposed question of law as extracted below arising out of the order dated September 10, 1990, passed in I.T.A. No.495/Ind of 1987 connectible with the order of refusal, dated December 10, 1990, passed on R. As. Nos. 195 and 196/Ind of 1990: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the provision of section 55(2) of the Income-tax Act, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that no capital gain accrued to the assessee?" Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer added a sum of Rs.50,250 being capital gain on sale of agricultural land on, consideration of Rs.1,75,000. The assessee contended that this was not, taxable as the cost in, he hands of the assessee was nil. The assessee filed, an Appeal. The Appellate Authority (Appellate Assistant Commissioner) deleted the addition in view of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492