| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1998 SLG 1492 1998 SLD 1492 1998 CLC 1875 |
Disciplinary Appeal No.T-21 of 1997, decision dated: 25-04-1998
JUSTICE MIAN MUHAMMAD AJMAL, CHAIRMAN, MUHAMMAD YUNAS TINOLI AND MUHAMMAD ALAM, MEMBERS
Abdur Rehman, Special Attorney for Appellant.
Respondent No. 1 in person. Tilat Qayum Qureshi, Addl. A.G. for the Government of N.W.F.P
Major MUHAMMAD ARIF through Abdur Rehman, Special Attorney
VS
Sardar BAHADUR KHAN and another
Law:
Section:
Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976----R. 173---Soldiers Litigation Act (IV of 1925), Ss. 7 & 12---Professional misconduct---On filing suit for maintenance and custody of children by plaintiff/wife, Family Court issued summons against defendant husband who was serving in Army---Brother of defendant husband wrote a letter to Judge Family Court on behalf of Commanding Officer that defendant being committed on operational military exercise, was not in a position to attend Court on date fixed for appearance with a request that case be adjourned to some other date--Advocate representing plaintiff wife obtained a copy of letter (produced by brother of defendant to Family Court) and addressed a letter to complainant/brother of defendant seeking verification of that letter--Complainant/brother of defendant had alleged in complaint filed before N.-W.F.P. Bar Council that Advocate was not authorised to correspond directly with Army Personnel contending that it was violation of provision of Ss.7 & 12 of Soldiers Litigation Act, 1925 and was against provisions of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973 and Rules framed thereunder--Complainant/brother of defendant had prayed that Advocate by doing so having committed professional misconduct, suitable action should be taken against him under relevant law---Held, only embargo placed on acts of an Advocate under 8.173 of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976 was that he could not communicate with nor could appear before a Public Officer without first disclosing his identity as an Advocate---Advocate having disclosed his identity as an Advocate/counsel for plaintiff wife, had not committed any professional misconduct as alleged by complainant/brother of defendant---Respondent Advocate had categorically written that he was seeking the verification of alleged letter, being counsel for plaintiff-wife, case was not hit by 8.173 of Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALAM (MEMBER).--- On 8th August, 1996, Major Muhammad Arif filed a complaint in the N.-W.F.P. Bar Council, Peshawar against respondent No.l Mr. Sardar Bahadur Khan, Advocate Swabi, alleging…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492