| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1998 SLG 814 1998 SLD 814 1998 SCMR 2003 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 136 of 1995, decision dated: 25-06-1998 (On appeal from the judgment dated 31-8-1994 of the N.W.F.P. Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 367 of 1993), hearing DATE : 9-06-1998
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN. AND WAJIHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
M. Ibrahim Satti, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Fateh Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 136 of 1995, decision dated: 25-06-1998 (On appeal from the judgment dated 31-8-1994 of the N.W.F.P. Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 367 of 1993), hearing DATE : 9-06-1998
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN. AND WAJIHUDDIN AHMED, JJ
M. Ibrahim Satti, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Fateh Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents
WARIS KHAN
VS
INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, N.W.F.P., PESHAWAR and another
Law:
Section:
North-West Frontier Province Police Rules, 1975--R. 11---Departmental appeal and appeal under R. 11 of Police Rules---Not a mere formality---Requirements---Where a comparatively small officer was pitched against the ostensible ire of a superior, placed way up higher than him. it was obligatory upon the departmental functionaries to have exercised their powers in a manifestly just, reasonable and impartial manner---When an enquiry in which a high officer is concerned one way or the other and in which serious matters, such as interpretation of several orders of Courts are posed, is shown speeded up and results in conclusion including the appeal within month, the development cannot go unnoticed---Departmental Officers having not acted m a transparent and uncontroversial manner, imparting a manifest infirmity to the proceedings, such proceedings could not stand the test of judicial scrutiny. A departmental appeal is not a mere formality. Such equally applies to an appeal under Rule 11 of the N.-W.F.P. Police Rules, 1975. It is understandable that where the order of the Appellate Authority is affirmative of the finding in an inquiry such may be brief. Still matters of substance need to be addressed. Justice should not only be done but must appear to have been done. In the peculiar circumstances of present case, where a comparatively small officer was pitched against the ostensible ire of a superior, placed way up higher than him, it was obligatory upon the departmental functionaries to have exercised their powers in a manifestly just, reasonable and impartial manner. The conditions in the present case do not appear to have been satisfied. Experience shows that such departmental inquiries usually consume a good deal of time, something which remains a cause of concern. Yet, when an enquiry, in which a high officer is concerned, one way or the other, and in which serious matters, such as interpretation of several orders of Courts, are posed, is shown speeded up and results in conclusion, including the appeal within months, the development cannot go unnoticed. The departmental officers, thus, in the overall circumstances, do not appear to have acted in a transparent and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492