Case Details

Citation(s)
1997 SLG 838 1997 SLD 838 1997 PLC 517
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Appeals Nos. SGA-501 and 502 of 1993/Pb., decision dated: 14-05-1996.
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SARGODHA DRAINAGE DIVISION, SARGODHA

VS

MUHAMMAD MUNIR and 3 others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)Ss. 25A &. 38AppealMaintainabilityEmployees who were removed from service by a verbal order without issuing them showcause notice and chargesheet and also without holding any enquiry against them, were ordered to be reinstated by Labour CourtEmployers who had challenged order of reinstatement passed by Labour Court in appeal filed before Appellate Tribunal, had taken employees back in service and were not interested in removal of employees from serviceIn view of such later development as also on merits appeals filed by employees had become infructuous and thus were liable to be dismissed. Ch. Muhammad Idrees for Appellant. Shaukat Hussain Baloch for Respondents date of hearing: 14th May, 1996. JUDGMENT By this judgment, I shall be disposing of Appeals Nos. SGA501 and 502 of 1993, both having been preferred on 28101993 by the Executive Engineer, Sargodha Drainage Division, Sargodha, respondents in the former appeal being Muhammad Munir, Muhammad Nawaz, Manzoor Hussain and Muhammad Ashraf, latter appeal having one Manzoor Ahmad as the sole respondent. Facts and legal propositions involved are similar. 2. Muhammad Munir etc. were appointed as Beldars and Manzoor Ahmad was appointed as Mate in the year 198990. They were removed from service on 12th and 13th of August, 1992, by a verbal order conveyed to them on 1381992. They challenged the orders of termination of their services, by filing grievance petitions, under section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, in the Punjab Labour Court No.5, Sargodha. 3. The appellant as respondent before the lower Court took up the plea that the appointments were on ad hoc basis made against purely temporary posts and retention of incumbents of the posts was dependant on budgetary sanction which was made on yearly basis. When no sanction, for the next year came, the services of these employees automatically came to an end. 4. The learned Labour Court is ofโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492