| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1998 SLG 1512 1998 SLD 1512 1998 CLC 1984 |
Lahore High Court
Intra-Court Appeal No.897 of ` 1997 in Constitutional Petition No.4573 of 1996/BWP, decision dated: 2-06-1998
LHSAN-UL-HAQ CHAUDHRY AND MUHAMMAD ZAFAR YASIN, JJ
Miss Raana Kaleem Toor for Appellant. Masud Ashraf Sheikh, Legal Advisor for the University
Intra-Court Appeal No.897 of ` 1997 in Constitutional Petition No.4573 of 1996/BWP, decision dated: 2-06-1998
LHSAN-UL-HAQ CHAUDHRY AND MUHAMMAD ZAFAR YASIN, JJ
Miss Raana Kaleem Toor for Appellant. Masud Ashraf Sheikh, Legal Advisor for the University
SHAGUFTA MAN
VS
ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY, BAHAWALPUR and another
Law:
Section:
Educational institution------Examination---Declaration of result---High Court noted glaring irregularities in marking of answer books of candidate and directed re-evaluation of answer book---Candidate got pass marks on re-evaluation---Order of High Court having attained finality, Authorities were directed to declare result of candidate based on re-evaluated marks in accordance with University Regulations with further direction that if candidate was found entitled to grace marks under Rules/Regulations, same should be given to him. Muhammad Fazil Khan's case PLD 1975 SC 331 and Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore v. Mst. Salma Afroze PLD 1992 SC 263 ref. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ZAFAR YASIN, J.--- The facts giving rise to the present Intra-Court Appeal are that the appellant got admission in M.A. English in Islamia University, Bahawalpur. She appeared as an external candidate in Second Annual Examination, 1991 held in August, 1992. She availed usual opportunities and cleared all papers except Paper IV (English Novel) in which she had again failed. She was refused of another chance to appear in the 2nd Annual Examination, 1994 in this paper. This way the appellant was constrained to file Constitutional Petition No. 180 of 1995/BWP praying that she was entitled to another chance. The writ petition was contested by the present respondent and was allowed vide judgment, dated 24-4-1995. The result was that the respondents were directed to accept the admission form of the petitioner immediately without any late fee and issue her Roll Number and permit her to appear in the examination. 2. Aggrieved by the judgment, dated 24-4-1995, the respondents filed Intra-Court Appeal No.17 of 1995/BWP. Meanwhile the petitioner took her examination but her result was withheld on the ground that the examination fee had not been deposited by the petitioner. The fact was brought to notice of the Honourable Division Bench, seized with the appeal filed by the respondents that the petitioner was exonerated from the payment of the late fee vide order, dated 20-4-1995. Their Lordships passed following interim order on 6-2-1996. "The result of the respondent was not declared by…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492