| Citation(s) |
| 1965 SLG 118 1965 SLD 118 1965 PLD 453 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. K-5 of 1963, decision dated: 30th April
1965. dates of hearing: 9th and 10th June 1964
S. A. RAHMAN, B. Z. KAIKAUS AND HAMOODUR RAHMAN, JJ
Dingomal N. Ramchandnani Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Percy D. Ramchandnani Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by S. M. Hanif Attorney for Appellants. Nurul Arfin Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Yousuf Rafi Attorney No. 4.
Respondents Nos.
KHUSHIRAM ATMARAM JAISINGHANI AND others
VS
CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, WEST PAKISTAN AND KARACHI AND OTHERS
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 6
Law: Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act, (XII of 1957)
Section: 18,43A,43(6),43
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 160-Special leave to appeal to Supreme Court - Granted where "Custodian had on a mistaken ground refused to exercise jurisdiction". (b) Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957), Ss. 43 (6) & 43-A-Review-Custodian refusing to exercise jurisdiction mistakenly assuming that matter in dispute was pending before Evacuee Property Tribunal constituted under S. 43-A-Such refusal valid ground for appeal filed by aggrieved party in Supreme Court. (c) Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957), S. 43 (6) [as substituted by Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) (Amendment) Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)] read with saving provision contained in S. 4 of Ordinance, and with 6(c), (e), General Clauses Act (X of 1897)Review-Extent of termination, by amending Ordinance, of Custodian's jurisdiction to review his order-Pending proceedings in review suo motu, or on application, treated on different footing by saving provision of S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)Section 6 (c) (e), General Clauses Act (X of 1897) cannot be invoked to continue review proceedings-Such proceedings do not pertain to a "substantive" right as contemplated by cl. (c) of S. 6, General Clauses Act, 1897 but to a procedural right, i.e. a right of review-Section 6, General Clauses Act, 1897, only applies when a different intention does not appear--Such intention, however, appears from saving S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)-Suo motu review not intended to be saved by provisions of S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)-Maxim: Expressio unius exclusio alterious, not of universal application Proceedings in review started on direction of Ministry, Refugees and Rehabilitation, Government of Pakistan, not deemed to be started on "application" but treated as suo motu in character. JUDGMENT B. Z. KAIKAUS, J.-This is an appeal by special leave under the Constitution of 1956 against an order of the Custodian of Evacuee Property refusing to review certain orders to which reference will presently be made. The appellants before us are Khushiram, Atmaram Madhavdas Atmaram, Gokaldas Atmaram all sons, and Devibai, widow of Atmaram…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 510