| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1997 SLG 682 1997 SLD 682 1997 PLC 235 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Revision No. RI-187 of 1995/Pb., decision dated: 19-02-1996.
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Revision No. RI-187 of 1995/Pb., decision dated: 19-02-1996.
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive, Karachi and others
VS
Mrs. NAZNEEN HUSSAIN
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)S. 38(3a)RevisionDismissal for nonprosecution RevivalRevision having been dismissed in default, petitioner filed application for its revival, but same was also dismissed for nonprosecutionPetitioner tiled second application for revival of revision after considerable delay without accompanying application for condonation of delay, but neither he nor his counsel appeared in Court on adjourned dates of hearingNo reason at all was forthcoming for such palpable prolonged silence of petitionerNo escape, thus, was possible from assumption that petitioner and his counsel were wholly negligent in pursuit of their cause and such lack of vigilance on their part was so gross and tremendous that it was not at all excusable or condonableApplication for revival of revision, was rejected, in circumstances. ORDER Revision petition, assailing an order dated 541995 of Punjab Labour Court No.6, at Rawalpindi, filed on 3041995, was dismissed in default on 15101995. An application for its revival was submitted on 24101995. That too was dismissed for nonprosecution on the next date, which was 29101995. Yet another application for restoration of the aforesaid application dated 24101995 was made on 2511996. It was obviously barred by time. 2. It is to be noted that the revision petition had, for the first time, been dismissed for nonprosecution on 15101995 at 1230 p.m., but in the application made for revival of the revision petition it has been averred that the learned counsel was busy in the Supreme Court of Pakistan till 1230 P.m., and he had deputed his clerk to make attendance in this Court in time, but when he reached the Court at about 1030 a.m. he came to know that the case had been called in early hours and dismissed in default. This is an incorrect statement. 3. Application for restoration of the revision petition also met the same fate, as it was dismissed at 1130 a.m., when nobody on behalf of the petitioners made appearance in the Court. The petitioners, it seems, went into deep slumber thereafter, as a move for revival of the earlier application dated 24101995 was made too late in the day on 2511996. Contents of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492