Case Details

Citation(s)
1996 SLG 651 1996 SLD 651 1996 PLC 692
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. LHR-616 of 1994/Pb., decision dated: 17-04-1996, hearing DATE : 10-04-1996
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

VS

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, SHEIKHUPURA and others MUHAMMAD ARSHAD Vs DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, SHEIKHUPURA and others

Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss. 25-A & 38---Adverse remarks by Labour Court ---Expunction of--­Impleading of party---Applicant who was not party to proceedings before Labour Court, was impleaded as party in appeal on his application for impleading him as party in appeal---Applicant despite the fact that he was not party to proceedings before Labour Court, a very harsh language was used against him by Labour Court in its decision---Applicant was outrageously condemned unheard and Labour Court in a unilateral manner had recorded disparaging and damaging observations and findings against applicant which observations and findings could cause irretrievable injury to the career of applicant---Such damaging and harsh remarks of Labour Court either ought to be expunged or applicant should be enabled to place before Labour Court his explanation and defence in the matter---Appellate Tribunal directed that observations recorded by Labour Court against applicant in decision against appellant, should not be taken into account by Department---Case was remanded to be decided on merits accordingly with direction that Labour Court would not again come to such conclusion against applicant so long as on hearing the applicant the Labour Court did not come again to the same conclusion. JUDGMENT Muhammad Arshad has assailed the soundness of the decision dated 20-10-1994, rendered by the Punjab Labour Court No.3, Lahore at Ferozewala; and in the course of hearing of appeal one Abdul Samad Qureshi Extra-Assistant Director of Agriculture (Extension), Daska, District Sialkot on 9-1-1996 submitted an application under Order 1, Rule 10 read with section 151, C.P.C. The appellant before this Tribunal has not opposed the application in right earnest. 2. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties as also the learned counsel representing the applicant aforementioned, I have formed an opinion that it would not be just and expedient to dispose of the appeal on merits and more proper course at this juncture would be to advert to the issue of propriety of the move made by Mr. Abdul Samad Qureshi. I have carefully gone through the decision dated 20-10-1994 by the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492