| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1995 SLG 747 1995 SLD 747 1995 SCMR 904 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 448 L of 1994, decision dated: 7-05-1994.
ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY AND SALEEM AKHTAR, JJ
Malik Muhammad Nawaz, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate on-Record. Nemo
Civil Petition No. 448 L of 1994, decision dated: 7-05-1994.
ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY AND SALEEM AKHTAR, JJ
Malik Muhammad Nawaz, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate on-Record. Nemo
MUHAMMAD RAFIOUE
VS
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS through its General Manager, Headquarters Office, Lahore and others
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 212(3) Application for pre mature retirement Withdrawal of such application Effect Civil servant submitting application on 1 1 1992, seeking pre mature retirement with effect from 2 4 1992 Civil servant subsequently submitting another application on 19 2 1992 for withdrawal of his application for pre mature retirement Civil servant was retired on 2-4 1992 Validity ¬Before the order of retirement, civil servant had already submitted his application which was received by competent Authority on 21 3 1992 Civil servant was authorised to withdraw his application for pre mature retirement before its acceptance by competent Authority Civil servant having been retired after the receipt of its subsequent application for withdrawal of his application seeking pre mature retirement, his retirement after the receipt of his withdrawal letter needed examination Leave to appeal was granted in circumstances. [Civil service]. ORDER ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J: Leave to appeal has been sought against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dated 24 3 1994. 2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner submitted an application on 1 1 1992, seeking pre mature retirement w.e.f. 2 4 1992. The petitioner submitted another application, on 19 2 199rZ, to Respondent No. 4, for withdrawal of his application for pre mature retirement. The petitioner was retired w.e.f. 2 4 1992. The petitioner's departmental representation, against the order of his retirement, was dismissed by the competent Authority. He approached the Federal Service Tribunal, but his appeal was dismissed by the impugned judgment. 3. According to the Tribunal, the petitioner's withdrawal application was received by the competent authority on 21 3 1992 i.e. after the acceptance of his earlier request. Under…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492