Case Details

Citation(s)
1997 SLG 425 1997 SLD 425 1997 PLD 578
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 1704-L of 1996, decision dated: 11-02-1997. (On appeal from the judgment dated 4-6-1996 of the Punjab .Service Tribunal, Lahore passed in Appeal No. 170 of 1995).
ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA AND RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, JJ
Ch. Ejaz Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court with Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record. Hafiz Tariq Naseem, Advocate Supreme Court with M. Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for the Caveator/
Respondent No. 1.

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

VS

Mrs. KISHWAR ASLAM and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-------S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Promotion--­Entitlement---Service Tribunal found civil servant entitled to promotion--­Validity---Authorities claimed that civil servant's appeal before Service Tribunal was not competent for she had not filed any Departmental appeal/representation before higher departmental authorities---Authorities in para wise comments submitted before Service Tribunal took no such objection---Even otherwise order impugned before Service Tribunal having been passed by Governor, no appeal/representation could possibly be made in hierarchy of Government---Appeal of civil servant before Service Tribunal was, thus, competent. Ali Nawaz Chowhan v. Governor PLD 1992 SC 413 rel. (b) Education Extension Centre Recruitment Rules, 1993-- ----S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)---Promotion--­Eligibility---Order of priority for method of recruitment ignored by Authority--­Civil servant claiming to be entitled to promotion in BS-20, approached Service Tribunal whereby her grievance was redressed and Authorities were directed to consider her case for promotion with effect from specified date ---Validity--­Order of priority for method of recruitment was to be determined from the order in which two methods viz. "by promotion" and "by transfer" had been prescribed---Service Tribunal was correct in holding that recruitment/appointment of petitioner to post in question by transfer was alternative method of recruitment which had to be resorted to only if no candidate was eligible for promotion---Promotion appeared to be the first and preferential method of recruitment and for making appointment, whether by promotion or by transfer, recommendations of appropriate Committee/Board constituted essential prerequisite---Petitioner's appointment by transfer was not made on recommendation of appropriate Committee or Board---No exception could be taken to impugned decision of Service Tribunal that civil servant was entitled to be considered for promotion from specified date---Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances. JUDGMENT ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, J.--Petitioner, Secretary to the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492