| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1996 SLG 447 1996 SLD 447 1996 PLC 309 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Punjab
Revision Petition No. LHR-656/Pb. of 1993, decision dated: 8-11-1995
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Revision Petition No. LHR-656/Pb. of 1993, decision dated: 8-11-1995
MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
1996 PLC 309 IMTIAZ AHMAD
VS
P.R.T.C. through Managing Director, Lahore and 3 others IMTIAZ AHMAD Vs P.R.T.C. through Managing Director, Lahore and 3 others
Law:
Section:
(a) Injunction--- ---- Grant of---Jurisdiction of Courts---Superior Courts, viz. High Court and Supreme Court, in exercise of their inherent jurisdiction, were empowered to see to it that no party was wronged- and even if an ad interim injunction order was not extended or was varied or vacated, affected party could be brought back to its original position and the "aggressor" or "wrong-doer" could be prevented from taking advantage of his own wrong---Superior Courts in exercise of their extraordinary jurisdiction, could always make such an order for safeguarding ultimate ends of justice---Ad interim injunction order in normal circumstances, order granted for a limited period, would stand vacated by afflux of time, unless it had been extended or made to last till end of litigation before a particular Court. Mst. Umda Begum and others v. Saad Saood Jan and others PLD 1962 Lah. 305; Bakhtawar and others v. Amin and others 1980 SCMR 89 and Muzaffar Ali Khan v. Sindh Cooperative Housing Authority and others 1985 CLC 1995 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss. 22-A (12), 25-A & 38(3-a)---Revision---Maintainability---Labour Court while entertaining grievance petition filed by employee, issued status quo up to specified date which date was not extended---Employer after expiry of period of status quo granted to employee, ordered his retirement from service---Retirement order passed by employer against employee, thus was not in disregard of status quo order---Revision filed by employee with an inordinate delay of 64 days was liable to be dismissed on merits as also by reason of its being hopelessly time-barred. JUDGMENT Revision petition is directed against the order dated 19-7-1993, passed by Haji Muhammad Akram Baitu, Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No.2, Lahore, rejected an application submitted on 3-5-1993 by Imtiaz Ahmad, serving as conductor with the Punjab Road Transport Corporations the course of the main petition filed on 13-4-1993, under section 22-A (12), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. 2. Imtiaz Ahmad was employed in the year 1981 and he opted for retirement under the Golden Hand Shake Scheme, having to his credit…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492