Case Details

Citation(s)
1995 SLG 1099 1995 SLD 1099 1995 CLC 1150
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 3303 of 1994, heard on 7-11-1994
CH. MUHAMMAD NASIM, J
S.A. Sahgal for Petitioner. Mian Mushtaq Ahmad for
Respondents

Mst. FARAH NAZ-

VS

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN through its Chairman and another

Law:

Section:

Educational institution------- Entitlement to concession of 1 per cent. grace marks ---Examinee having failed to pass her Intermediate Examination claimed concession of 1 per cent. grace marks---Candidate was entitled to one per cent. grace marks once only either on the basis of examination of 11th Class or on the basis of Examination of 12th Class---Such grace marks had not been allowed to the candidate on any of the occasions---Total marks of Intermediate Examination being 1100, 1 per cent. grace marks would come up to 11, which were sufficient to declare examinee successful ---Examinee was found entitled to grace marks and she was declared to have passed her Intermediate Examination on the basis of such grace marks in circumstances. Writ Petition No. 16472 of 1993, decided on 30-11-1993 ref. JUDGMENT Miss Farah Naz petitioner appeared in Intermediate Part I (11th Class) Annual Examination of 1991. She passed in respect of the papers of Urdu, English, Islamic Education and Physics. Due to her ailment she could not take the examination of Chemistry and Biology Papers. However, she was promoted to the 2nd year. The petitioner appeared in the Intermediate Annual Examination, 1992 but failed in (i) English, (ii) Pakistan Studies and (iii) Chemistry. She appeared in the Supplementary Examination, 1992 and except Chemistry Paper she qualified the remaining papers. As a matter of right she was allowed to appear in the next Examination to clear the subject of Chemistry-I and II Papers. She appeared in Chemistry both in I and II Papers in the Annual Examination of 1993. She qualified in Chemistry Paper II but failed in Chemistry Paper I by 7 marks having secured 18 marks in the theory paper while 25 marks were required to qualify that paper. However, she passed in the practical paper securing 21 marks. She was declared failed in toto in the Intermediate Examination. Some of the students having similarly failed in one subject by few marks agitated for the grant of grace marks at the rate of 1% of the total marks allowed under the rules through Constitutional writ petitions at the Principal Seat and the same were accepted vide order dated 19-10-1993 in Writ Petition No.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492