Case Details

Citation(s)
1998 SLG 94 1998 SLD 94 1998 PTD 767 (1996) 221 ITR 127

Income-tax Cases Nos.36 of 1992 and 22 of 1993, decision dated: 1st November, 1995
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI AND P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, JJ
S.R. Ashok for Petitioner S.R. Chandra Murthy for
Respondent.

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax

VS

TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 256,37

Income-tax---Reference---Business expenditure---Secret commission---Findings with reference to genuineness and quantum of deduction as secret commission whether justified---Question of law---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Ss-.37 & 256. Held, that it had been contended on behalf of the Revenue that despite various specific defects, irregularities and lacunae pointed out by the Income-tax Officer in the vouchers and other evidence produced by the respondent-assessee in support of its claim, the deduction was allowed on general considerations such as the auditors' report or the directors' report and on the ground that the assessee-company had eminent persons on its board, or the assessee was being allowed similar commission without doubting the correctness of the documents produced during the previous years. In the facts and circumstances and on the tenor of the findings recorded by the Tribunal. the question whether, on the material available in the case, the findings given by the Tribunal with regard to the genuineness and quantum of deductions to be allowed - under the head of secret commission' were perverse and based on irrelevant considerations had to be referred.. JUMGMENT These petitions are filed under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-Central, seeking reference of the following two questions for the opinion of this Court: "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the expenditure by way of secret commission was deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act in computing the business income of the assessee? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate Tribunal is right in law in coming to the conclusion that the payments claimed to have been made under the head 'secret commission is not opposed to public policy and is an item of deduction in the computation of the total income of the assessee?" Two other questions arising out of the same order of the Tribunal have already been referred by the Tribunal…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492