Case Details

Citation(s)
1998 SLG 102 1998 SLD 102 1998 PTD 834 (1996) 221 ITR 481
Madhya Pradesh High Court
M. C. C. No.51 of 1990, decision dated: 9-02-1996
A. K. MATHUR, C, J. AND S. K. KULSHRESHTHA, J
A. Adhikari for the Commissioner. B.L. Nema for the Assessee

COMMISSIONER OF IncomE tax

VS

MUHAMMAD IQBAL and others

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 254

Income-tax-----Appeal to Appellate Tribunal---Powers of Tribunal---Additional ground of appeal that order of I.T.O. barred by limitation raised before Tribunal for first time---Additional ground admitted by Tribunal---Justified---Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, S.254. In the assessment year 1978-79, the appeals of the three assessees regarding their objections to the amount of income assessed and interest levied by the Income-tax Officer were dismissed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and second appeals were filed before the Tribunal on the same objections. During the course of hearing of these appeals, the assessees sought permission to raise preliminary objection by way of additional grounds that the order of the Income-tax Officer was barred by limitation and hence a nullity and that as a consequence, all taxes paid by the assessee be directed to be refunded. The Tribunal admitted the additional plea of limitation and allowed the appeals. Thereafter, an application for rectification under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the additional grounds should not have been permitted to be raised, was rejected by the Tribunal. On a reference: Held, that the Tribunal was justified in admitting the additional grounds of appeal and rightly held that the assessments were barred by limitation. Both the questions were questions of fact. JUDGMENT This is an Income-tax Reference at the instance of the Revenue and the following two questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal before this Court for answer, which read as under: "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in admitting the additional grounds of appeal? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessments were barred by limitation?" The brief facts giving rise to this reference are thus: The assessment year involved is 1978-79 in the cases of all the three assessees, viz., Kalekhan, Muhammad Hanif, Muhammad Idris and Muhammad Iqbal. The appeals of the assessees regarding their objections to the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492