| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1996 SLG 512 1996 SLD 512 1996 PLC 461 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Cases Nos. 4A (354), 4A(355), 4A(356), 4A(357) and 4A(358) of 1995, decision dated: 12-05-1996
M.M. PIRZADA, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos. 4A (354), 4A(355), 4A(356), 4A(357) and 4A(358) of 1995, decision dated: 12-05-1996
M.M. PIRZADA, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SAEED ALI and others
VS
INDUS MOTORS CO. LTD. and others SAEED ALI and others Vs INDUS MOTORS CO. LTD. and others
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----S. 25-A---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O. 15(3)(a)(h) & (4)---Dismissal from service---Employees were dismissed from service after issuing 'them show-cause notices and holding enquiry against them on allegation that they not only refused to carry out reasonable and lawful orders of their superiors, but also threatened said superiors---No allegation of enmity or bias was made by employees against Enquiry Officer or the manner of conducting enquiry by him either in their grievance notice or in grievance petition or in their affidavit-in-evidence--Evidence on record had fully proved that Enquiry Officer had conducted enquiry into misconduct alleged in charge-sheet against employees, honestly, fairly and impartially and without any influence from employer---Employees neither in their grievance notice nor in their grievance petitions or in their affidavit-in-evidence had alleged that witness who gave evidence against them in domestic enquiry had any enmity or animosity against them---Misconduct of employees on basis of which they were dismissed from service having fully been proved, employees were rightly dismissed from service and order of dismissal could not be interfered with. PLD 1981 SC 225; 1987 PLC 23; 1983 PLC 143; 1969 PLC 691 and 1995 PLC 675 ref. (b) West 'Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)--- ----S.O. 15(3)(h)---Misconduct---Act subversive of discipline---Threat given to a superior by a worker outside factory premises in connection with an occurrence in factory, would be covered by S.O. 15(3)(h) of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing' Orders) Ordinance, 1968 as an act subversive of discipline. 1980 PLC 972 ref. ORDER Since the abovementioned cases involved the common facts and grounds therefore I would like to dispose of the same by this one common order. 2. The respondents in this case have filed an application under section 22-A(9)(b) of the IRO, 1969 stating that the applicants have filed their cases under section 25-A of the IRO, 1969, before t1ie…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492