| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1996 SLG 545 1996 SLD 545 1996 PLC 528 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. 1991 and Miscellaneous Application No. 4425 of 1995, decision dated: 1st November, 1995
ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH AND ABDUL LATIF U. QURESHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Constitutional Petition No. 1991 and Miscellaneous Application No. 4425 of 1995, decision dated: 1st November, 1995
ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH AND ABDUL LATIF U. QURESHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Syed MUBASHAR ZAWAR and 16 others
VS
Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director General, Karachi and another Syed MUBASHAR ZAWAR and 16 others Vs Messrs CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director General, Karachi and another
Law:
Section:
Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance (XXX of 1982)--- ----S. 27---Civil Aviation Authority Rules and Regulations, Regln. 7, 15(3)(x) & (d)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Civil Aviation Authority planning to conduct tests/interviews of its employees who had been recruited on recommendation of Minister and Director-General irregularly and out of merit---Petitioners falling within such category impugning call for tests and interviews---Constitutional petition---Competency---Petitioners failed to show as to if any term and condition of contract of service had been violated which in turn might have attracted provisions of some statute or rule to give them right to file Constitutional petition---Petitioners were governed by rules of service framed by Board of Directors of Civil Aviation Authority which being statutory body had come into existence under Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance, 1982---Remedy of appeal was available to petitioners in terms of Regln. 7.15(3)(x) & (d) of Civil Aviation Authority Rules and Regulations framed under S. 27, Civil Aviation Authority Ordinance, 1982---Petitioners apprehended that they were going to be terminated from their services by notice for appearing in tests---Constitutional petition was premature for petitioners only apprehend their ultimate termination which presently was not spelt out from notice for appearance in tests/interviews---Merely because petitioners had been called upon to appear in tests/interviews, could not result into termination of their services---If it so happened, petitioners could seek remedy by way of .appeal---Petitioners would also have remedy to sue for damages---Employees of Civil Avilation Authority could not resort to remedy through Constitutional petition in circumstances. Mrs. Anisa Rehman v. PIAC 1994 SCMR 2232; Anwar Hussain v. Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan PLD 1984 SC 194 and Constitutional Petition No. D-377 of 1991 ref. ORDER ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH, J.---These five petitions are being disposed of by this common order as the points raised in all these petitions are common. The petitioners in these petitions are employees of Civil…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492