| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1995 SLG 224 1995 SLD 224 1995 SCMR 1000 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 332 of 1994, decided on 20th December, 1994.
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI AND MUKHTAR AHMED, JUNEJO, JJ
Fazal Elahi Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan. Advocate on Record for Petitioner, Nemo for
Respondents.
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 332 of 1994, decided on 20th December, 1994.
SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI AND MUKHTAR AHMED, JUNEJO, JJ
Fazal Elahi Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ejaz Muhammad Khan. Advocate on Record for Petitioner, Nemo for
Respondents.
ARMY NO. 8470067 MUHAMMAD FARRUKH BASHIR BHATTI
VS
ENGINEER INCHIEF, GHO, RAWALPINDI and another --Respondents
Law: Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977
Section: 4
Law: Limitation Act, 1908
Section: 5,14
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 212(3)
Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, 1977 R. 4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Ss. 5 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3) Adverse remarks Departmental appeal addressed to Appellate Authority was returned to civil servant with remarks that same was not maintainable Appeal filed before Service Tribunal was dismissed as being time barred Leave to appeal was granted to consider civil servant’s contention that even if it was found that appeal before appellate Authority was not competent it was valid ground for condoning delay in filing appeal before Service Tribunal both under S. 5 and S. 14, Limitation Act, 1908. ORDER SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.The petitioner is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal dated 9 6 1994 whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed Service Appeal of the petitioner as time barred. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that after the disposal of his representation by the Departmental Authority against…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492