Law:

Section:

Workmen's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923)--- ----S. 30---Appellate Jurisdiction, exercise of---Compensation---Claim of--­Justification---Where medical certificate did not tally with record, certain columns whereof, having been changed with different pen and ink, such document being tampered with, held, could not be relied upon in claim of compensation for physical disability---Authority having rightly discarded such documentary evidence and holding that appellant did not suffer from disability, such finding could not be interfered with by Labour Appellate Tribunal in exercise of Appellate jurisdiction. H.R. Haider for Appellant. Muhammad Iqbal Khokhar for Respondent. Date of hearing: 2nd August, 1986. JUDGMENT This is an appeal preferred under section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act against the decision dated 4-3-1986 delivered by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Lahore. 2. Previously the case was remanded for the examination of the doctor who had issued the certificate Exh. P-3. Not the same doctor but some other doctor has been examined. The appellant claimed compensation on account of an accident alleged to have been met by the appellant arising out of and in the course of his employment. He had during the accident received injuries on the right clavicle and some ribs. The learned Commissioner has rightly found that certificate Exh. P-3 is tampered with. Columns Nos. 7 and 8 were originally left blank by drawing…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492