| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1995 SLG 1010 1995 SLD 1010 1995 PLC 5 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 498 of 1990, decided on 21st March, 1992.
MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD ASLAM PIRZADA CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 498 of 1990, decided on 21st March, 1992.
MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD ASLAM PIRZADA CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD SADIO
VS
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KASUR and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Civil service--- ---- Adverse remarks ---Expunction---Reporting Officer had given civil servant who was a Police Inspector, good/very good remarks in all columns of report and rated him as A-I, declaring him fit for promotion, but Countersigning Officer, despite agreeing with A-I rating in report, gave adverse remarks--Same Countersigning Officer had earlier given him positive reports not only for period preceding his negative report, but also for periods following the same---Adverse remarks given by Countersigning Officer were not consistent with his previous satisfactory/good remarks teen by him in confidential reports---In face of successive good reports given by same Countersigning Officer, adverse remarks given by him for a short period of six months were out of tune with rest of the reports and were not based on objective assessment of work and conduct of civil servant---Adverse remarks were also not consistent with appreciations recorded by Countersigning Officer himself in connection with a number of good jobs done by civil servant---For his services and good work done, civil servant was awarded 7 commendation certificates and was also given cash reward during the very period in which adverse remarks were given against him---Civil servant had not been given a fair deal by Countersigning Officer and lack of objectivity in recording those adverse remarks against civil servant by Countersigning officer was too apparent to be overlooked---Adverse remarks against civil servant we either not based on fact or were premature---Since overall assessment for fitness of civil servant for promotion and classification of report was based on detailed assessment made by Countersigning Officer in various parts of report, adverse remarks regarding fitness and classification subsequent given by same Countersigning Officer were not fair---Adverse remarks we a ordered to be expunged, in circumstances. 1990 PLC (C.S.) 111 and 1983 PLC (C,S.) 303 ref. MA. Riaz for Appellant. Syed Abbas Raza, District Attorney for Respondents Date of hearing: 20th November, 1991. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMID KHAN (MEMBER).---The appellant, Muhammad Sadiq, Police Inspector has filed this appeal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492