| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 294 1994 SLD 294 1994 PLC 477 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 47 of 1992, decision dated: 23rd May, 1993.
AKHTAR HASSAN, CHAIRMAN AND SYED AALA AHMAD, MEMBER
Syed Kazim Hussain for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain, D. A. for
Respondents.
Appeal No. 47 of 1992, decision dated: 23rd May, 1993.
AKHTAR HASSAN, CHAIRMAN AND SYED AALA AHMAD, MEMBER
Syed Kazim Hussain for Appellant. Manzoor Hussain, D. A. for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD RAZAQ
VS
CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, RANGE MANAGEMENT CIRCLE, LAHORE and another
Law:
Section:
(a) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)-------S. 4---Punjab Civil 'Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, Rr.2(1)(c) & 6---Removal from service---Civil servant was removed from service on charge that he had furnished fictitious school leaving certificate showing his educational qualification and date of birth ---Authority-cum Authorised Officer, directed initiation of disciplinary proceedings against civil servant, who was served with a show-cause notice---Civil servant contested proceedings by denying charge against him, but Authorised Officer acting himself as "Authority" awarded employee major penalty of removal from service---When same Officer acts simultaneously as "Authority" as well as "Authorised Officer" certain restrictions are imposed on his powers in matter of awarding penalty---Authority when acting as "Authorised Officer" can impose only a minor penalty and cannot himself award a major penalty for which he has to submit file to "Authority" with his recommendations. (b) Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975--- ---Rr 2(1)(c) & 6---Major penalty---Awarding of---Safeguards to civil servant---Considerable safeguards have been conceived by rules in favour of civil servant before subjecting him to extreme punishment of dismissal or removal from service---Action has to be initiated by "Authority" by directing another officer (Authorised Officer) to proceed with it---Authorised Officer in his own place would decide whether or not he should look into matter by holding a formal enquiry---Enquiry Officer has to do his own bit by assessing evidence and making a report as to guilt or otherwise of civil servant---Such report would be sent to Authorised Officer who again would apply his mind to it to consider where minor or major penalty was called for---Authorised Officer, in case he considers major penalty was called for would forward his recommendations to "Authority" for appropriate orders in case of major penalty---Provisions of R. 2(1)(c) of a Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 could not be construed to mean that all those safeguards would be curtailed by authorising same officer…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492