| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 985 1994 SLD 985 1994 PLC 1560 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No. 549 of 1990, decision dated: 19-12-1993.
AKHTAR HASSAN, CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No. 549 of 1990, decision dated: 19-12-1993.
AKHTAR HASSAN, CHAIRMAN AND ABDUL HAMID KHAN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD SADIQ, S.I./S.H.O. FAISALABAD
VS
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Civil service------- Reduction in rank---Civil servant was retired compulsorily from service on charges that he being Inspector/S.H.O. of Police had prepared with forged signatures of D.S.P. case diary in a case---On filing departmental appeal, penalty of compulsory retirement was converted into reduction in rank ---D.S.P. whose signatures were on disputed case diary, had disowned them and took position that neither it was written in his hand nor was it recorded on his dictation---Handwriting Expert's report showed that disputed signatures on case diary were not those of D.S.P.---Enquiry Officer gave his finding to the effect that since other Investigation Officer in case was accused civil servant, disputed signatures on case diary were affixed either by accused civil servant himself or he got the same affixed by some one else---Enquiry Officer had not found civil servant guilty beyond any shadow of doubt and Inspector-General had also observed in his order that both civil servant and D.S.P. were partly guilty so far as writing of case diary in question was concerned---Department did not consider it appropriate to hold a joint enquiry against civil servant and D.S.P.---Though a separate enquiry was ordered against D.S.P. but its result had not been made' known---Charge on basis of which punishment of reduction in rank was awarded to civil servant, having not conclusively been proved against him, giving benefit of doubt to civil servant order awarding punishment of reduction in rank, was set aside and civil servant was restored to his original rank of Inspector. MA. Riaz for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondent. Date of hearing: 15th September, 1993. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMID KHAN (MEMBER).---The appellant, Muhammad Sadiq, while posted as Inspector/SHO, Police Station Saddar, Faisalabad was retired compulsorily from service vide Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Faisalabad/respondent No.3's order dated 14-9-1988 on the charge of preparing with forged signatures of DSP/SDPO M. Akram Niazi, Case Diary No.14 in case FIR No. 151, dated 27-4-1987 under section 303/325/148/DPC, PS Saddar, Faisalabad. The departmental appeal preferred by him…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492