Law:

Section:

Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)--------S. 4---Appeal---Competency of---Civil servant had challenged letter issued by Authority to him according to which he was asked to return vehicles, air­ conditioners, furniture and other equipment as also Bank accounts and other related record for purpose of audit as he was no more incharge of center concerned---Said letter in no way amounted to terms and conditions which had allegedly been infringed and in absence of appellate order as to bring cause of action under provisions of S. 4(1) of the Act, appeal of civil servant to that extent was incompetent. Raja Muhammad Bashir for Appellant. M. Javid Aziz Sandhu, Standing Counsel for Respondents. Date of hearing: 9th June, 1994. JUDGMENT ABDUL RAZZAQ A. THAHIM (CHAIRMAN): --Appellant Mr. M. Sadiq Swati is working as OSD (B-21) in the Establishment Division. He has filed this appeal under section 4 of the Service Tribunals with the following prayers: (a) Set aside the ruling given by the respondent No. 1, being devoid of any legal force. (b) Restrain the respondents from their unlawful activities against the appellant. (c) Pass structures against each of the respondents in proportion to his role in the conspiracy to cause harm to the appellant. (d) Direct the respondent No. 2 to seek the approval of the competent authority to release salary of the appellant and provide all other fringe benefits as per his entitlement without further delay. (e) Direct the respondent No. 2 to recall Mr. Majeed from LPR to face an inquiry into the allegations of serious misconduct levelled by the appellant against him, (f) Give any other relief the Honourable Tribunal may deem necessary, just and equitable. The appeal came up for preliminary hearing on 19-5-1994 when we issued pre­admission notices to the respondents for comments. Comments have been filed by respondents 2 and 3. 2. We have heard Mr.. Raja Muhammad Bashir, the learned counsel for the appellant at length. He has given long history of the case and the disciplinary proceedings taken against the appellant. The learned counsel for the appellant has confined his case to prayers at (a) and (d) only and dropped the rest of the…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492