Case Details

Citation(s)
1996 SLG 135 1996 SLD 135 1996 SCMR 1470 (1995) 74 TAX 81
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos.K-140 of 1981, 64-K, 65-K and 66-K of 1985, decision dated: 19-01-1989
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J., SHAFIUR RAHMAN, ZAFFAR HUSSAIN MIRZA AND SAAD SAOOD, JAN, JJ
Nasim Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Shabbir Ghaury, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant (in Civil Appeal No. K-140 of 1981) Nasurllah Awan,. Advocate Supreme Court and Muzaffar Hassan, Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents No. 1 and 2 (in Civil Appeal

B.P. BISCUIT FACTORY LTD., KARACHI

VS

WEALTH TAX OFFICER and another Civil Appeals Nos.64-K, 65-K and 66-K of 1985 M/s. EBRAHIM BROTHERS LIMITED vs WEALTH TAX OFFICER and another

Law: Wealth Tax Act, (XV of 1963)

Section: 2,2(3)(ii)

(a) Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963)--- ----S. 2(m)---Net wealth---Meaning---Net wealth of an assessee means the difference between his assets and the debts owned by him.---[Words and phrases]. (b) Interpretation of statutes------ ----Ordinance issued by the President---Error in date of enforcement of Ordinance on account of a typographical mistake published in the official Gazette-- -Printers of the Gazette could on their own issue a corrigendum without making a reference to the President or the Ministry of Law---Contention that the Ordinance should be taken to have come into force from the date incorrectly printed in the official Gazette was repelled. (c) Wealth Tax Act (XV of 1963)--S. 2(3)(ii) [as substituted by Wealth Tax (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1980)]---Assets---Definition---Only such immovable properties as are held for the purposes of business of construction and sale or for the business of construction and letting them out, fall within the definition. ---[Words and phrases]. The definition of assets does not seem to be very happily worded. It can be interpreted as referring to three different categories of immovable properties, to wit:-- (i) immovable property held for the purpose of **** letting out of property; (ii) immovable property held for the purpose of business of ***** letting out of property, and (iii) immovable property held for the purpose of business of construction and sale or business of construction and letting out, of property. There is a slight difference between properties falling in categories (i) and (ii); thus the property of an assessee who carries on business of letting out its properties will fall in category No. (ii) whereas the property of an assessee who occasionally leases out the space not immediately needed by him will fall in category No. (i). The last category, that is, category No. (iii) relates to the property of those assessees who are engaged in the business of construction of properties for the purpose either of sale or of letting out. Now, the definition as it stands worded can refer to any one of these categories. Wealth Tax Act is a fiscal statute as it imposes a pecuniary burden on the citizens. In a fiscal…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492