| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 109 1994 SLD 109 1994 PTD 856 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
ITA No. 884/LB of 1987-88, decision dated: 30-01-1994, hearing DATE : 29-01-1994
NASIM SIKANDAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND IFTIKHAR AHMAD BAJWA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ashiq Hussain for Appellant. Haji Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent
ITA No. 884/LB of 1987-88, decision dated: 30-01-1994, hearing DATE : 29-01-1994
NASIM SIKANDAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND IFTIKHAR AHMAD BAJWA ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ashiq Hussain for Appellant. Haji Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 13(2)
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)------S.13(2)---Cost of construction declared by assessee---Addition---If the difference in the declared value and the determined value is nominal or is not too low, the provisions of S.13(2), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 would not be attracted. 1991 PTD (Trib.) 294 ref. ORDER NASIM SIKANDAR (JUDICIAL MEMBER): --The assessee in this case is an individual and seeks indulgence of this Tribunal against the impugned order rendered by the CIT (Appeals-I1), Lahore on 7-9-1987. 2. This appeal was heard alongwith another Appeal ITA No.188/LB of 1988-89 (assessment year 1986-87) and disposed of by this Tribunal through its order, dated 20-4-1991. A miscellaneous application was subsequently made to assert that this Tribunal failed to dispose the grievance of the assessee against addition at Rs.45,175 made by the assessing officer under section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Ordinance. This application registered as MA No.104/LB of 1991-92 (assessment year 1986-87) was decided by this Tribunal through its order, dated 20-5-1993. A Division Bench ordered recalling of the aforesaid consolidated order in respect of two pleas which could not be disposed of through the aforesaid order. The first was that the Tribunal did not consider the addition of Rs.45,175 under the aforesaid provision of law and the second that the provisions of section 13(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance were not attracted in the circumstances of the case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the assessing officer found the declared construction cost of a house at Rs.160 per sq. ft. to be on the lower side and, therefore, he added the difference between the declared value of the construction and the value determined by the assessing officer at Rs.45,175. It may be added that out of a total sum of IZs.525,175 declared on account of construction of house a sum of Rs.480,000 was considered to have been accounted for. Learned counsel for the applicant placing reliance upon a reported case of this Tribunal cited as 1991 PTD (Trib.) 294 contends that no addition in this case was warranted as the difference between the declared and adopted value was only 9% while in the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492