Law:

Section:

Industrial disputeof serviceEmployee was appointed as Security Guard, but later on his services were terminated and his duties were entrusted to a contractor who was fully equipped with all security techniques, systems and implements where employee was junior most security guardRights of employer to organise running of his affairs was his internal matter and looking to security problem that city was facing, no fault could be found with decision of employer who wanted to improve security arrangements in view of prevailing circumstances. DECISION The appellant was appointed by the -Respondents as a Security Guard on 331987 and his services came to be terminated on 2911992. The security duties had been entrusted to a contractor. 2. The appellant admits that before the termination of his service, M/s. Shahzada Security Service had taken over duties from 111992. Later Intezam International had replaced them from 1531992 who were equipped "with all the latest security techniques, systems and implements". 3. Admittedly the appellant was the junior most of the security guards. The fact however is that…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492