Law:

Section:

Industrial dispute Termination of serviceReinstatement with back benefitsValidity Services of employee were terminated abruptly without any prior notice or holding any enquiryGrievance petition filed by employee against his termination was resisted by employer on ground of delay and absence of any relationship of employer and employee between the partiesAttendance carol duly signed on behalf of employer had fully established that employee had been working with employers for the last about two yearsAlleged delay in filing grievance petition had also not been pressed by employersCourt below had correctly found that employee was working with employers and was verbally removed from employment which could not be done under the law­Employee was rightly reinstated with full back benefits in circumstances. DECISION This appeal calls in question the order of the Labour Court No. I, Karachi, reinstating the -Petitioner in his employment with back benefits. The circumstances in which the appeal arose, in short, are as follows. 2. It was alleged that the -Petitioner was working with the -Respondent as O.D. Checker from 1821990 but without a letter of appointment. His services came to be terminated abruptly on 941992 and he was kept guessing as to why things had come to such a pass. He, later, served a grievance notice and then filed the petition: The petition was resisted on the grounds of delay and the absence of any relationship between the parties. 3. The -Petitioner was his own witness. Rehan Salam, Administrative Manager appeared on behalf of the -Respondents. 4. The -Respondent had produced the Acknowledgement due card with a .signature thereon. Rehan Salam admitted that the address on…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492