| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1995 SLG 1118 1995 SLD 1118 1995 PLC 225 |
National Industrial Relations Commission
Cases Nos. 4-A (?98) and 24(283) of 1994, decided on 27th November, 1994.
GOHAR YAQOOB YOUSAF ZAI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cases Nos. 4-A (?98) and 24(283) of 1994, decided on 27th November, 1994.
GOHAR YAQOOB YOUSAF ZAI, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL HANIF
VS
HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION through its General Manager, Islamabad
Law:
Section:
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--- ----Ss.15 & 22-A(8)(g,---Unfair labour practice on part of employers---Employee who was proceeded against on certain allegations, had contended that he had been victimised on account of his trade union activities and by so doing employer had committed unfair labour practice---Employee was served with charge-sheet. alongwith statement of allegations against him and that charge-sheet was replied by him, but in his reply employee nowhere alleged that action against him had been taken by employer on account of his trade union activities---Another show-cause notice served on employee was also replied, but in that also he had not alleged that action against him was being taken on account of trade union activities---Employee had himself admitted that he was involved in various criminal cases and out of those criminal cases he had obtained bail in certain cases, but challan of those cases had yet to be submitted before Court of competent jurisdiction---Inquiry Officer's report showed that employee was found guilty of all charges of misconduct levelled against him---Employee, in circumstances, had failed to establish any case of unfair labour practice on part of employer, in order to invoke jurisdiction of Court within meaning of Ss. 15 & 22-A(8)(g) of the Ordinance---Employer had right to take disciplinary action against an employee who was found guilty of misconduct. National Motors Limited v. Muhammad Hanif 1987 PLC 457 ref. Abdul Hafeez Amjad for Petitioner. S. Rais Ahmad Jafri for Respondent, ORDER This is a petition under section 22-A(8)(g) of the IRO, 1969 wherein the petitioner contends that due to his trade union activities the respondent Establishment is bent upon committing unfair labour practice as the petitioner is an active member of House Building Finance Corporation Employees Union which is also CBA of Islamabad, Peshawar-Zone. He further contended that a baseless charge-sheet was also served upon the petitioner wherein the inquiry was also conducted and the petitioner is suspended from service since, November, 1992. 2. Alongwith this petition an application for interim injunction under Regulation…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492