Case Details

Citation(s)
1995 SLG 1456 1995 SLD 1456 1995 PLC 762
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Civil Petition No. 290-P of 1993, decided on 10th January, 1995.
ABDUL RAZZAQ A. THAHIM, CHAIRMAN AND MUHAMMAD ISMAIL, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

VS

Law:

Section:

Civil service- ---- Termination of services---Civil servants were appointed on basis of their parent's quota, but later on when on verification it was revealed that their appointments were made over and above the said quota, their services were dispensed with by Competent Authority during probationary period---Parents of civil servants were working in service of Authority while according to office order sons of deceased employees of Authority were to be given preference and priority over and above other persons---On verification when it transpired that appointment were made in excess of their quota, their services were rightly terminated in view of the fact that any appointment made in excess of reserved quota, could not be termed as regular, but such appointments would be adhoc and while terminating such appointments, no notice was required. Abdul Hafeez Amjad, Represented for Appellants (in Appeals Nos. 412(P), 413(P), 415(P) to 417(P) of 1994). Adam Koran, Represented for Appellant (in Appeal No. 497(P) of 1994). Waqar Ahmed Seth for Respondents (in all Appeals except Appeal No. 497(P) of 1994). Syed Amir Muhammad for Respondents (in Appeal No. 497(P) of 1994). Nemo for Respondents Date of hearing: 20th February, 1995. JUDGMENT ABDUL RAZZAQ A. THAHIM (CHAIRMAN).-All the six appeals are identical involving common questions of fads and law, therefore, we propose to dispose of these appeals by this single judgment. 2. The relevant facts of these appeals are that the appellants were appointed in the year 1994 under WAPDA by competent Authority in different capacities as Junior Clerks/Bill Distributors/LS-II, etc. by separate orders on the basis of WAPDA employees sons quota. Subsequently, the respondent WAPDA relying on para. (2) of appointment orders, the services of all the appellants were terminated during the probationary period by separate orders dated 30-3-1994 and 28-4-1994 and 13-7-1994 and they were relieved of their duties. Being aggrieved, they filed departmental appeals which were not responded to and finally they have come before this Tribunal by way of these appeals under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. 3. The learned counsel…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492