Law:

Section:

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)--S. 25-A---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)---Dismissal of petitioner on charge of misconduct---Validity---Petitioner had already exhausted his remedies up to the Supreme Court, while challenging his order of dismissal---Petitioner could not re-agitate order of his dismissal on any fresh ground like acquittal in criminal case which was for reasons of lack of corroboration to the statement of investigation officer---Inquiry proceedings and criminal case can go on side by side and finding in inquiry proceedings can survive without being affected by finding of acquittal in criminal case---No ground was made out for interference by Supreme Court---Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances. ORDER SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J: --Vide letter dated 15-3-1977, Assistant Director F.I.A. informed respondent herein that their employee, who is petitioner before us, was arrested and committed to jail custody for indulging in criminal misconduct by preparing and issuing forged educational certificates and domiciles. On 23-4-1978 he was charge-sheeted for submitting to the respondent Corporation forged documents including Matric certificates and papers indicating false age and also showing that he had qualified for librarianship examination. Inquiry proceedings in the Corporation and criminal case in the competent Court proceeded and went along side by side. Meanwhile petitioner challenged issue of Charge-sheet in the enquiry proceedings by the respondent by filing a civil suit, in which plaint was rejected for want of jurisdiction and in that connection it was held by the High Court and Supreme Court that suit was not maintainable and proper remedy for the petitioner was to file application under section 25-A of I.R.O. Since there was no stay order from the Court, inquiry proceedings concluded resulting in dismissal of the petitioner on 20-12-1978 for the reason that charges stood proved. Feeling aggrieved against the dismissal, petitioner approached but without success, Labour Court, Labour Appellate Tribunal, and High Court and their concurrent finding is positive that he furnished information to the respondent, which…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492