| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 513 1994 SLD 513 1994 PLC 59 |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Appeals Nos. KAR-624 and 625 of 1992, decision dated: 31st October, 1993.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Humayun for Appellant. Muhammad Majeed Jeelani for
Respondent.
Appeals Nos. KAR-624 and 625 of 1992, decision dated: 31st October, 1993.
AGHA ALI HYDER, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Muhammad Humayun for Appellant. Muhammad Majeed Jeelani for
Respondent.
M/s. TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI
VS
RIAZ ALI
Law:
Section:
(a) Industrial dispute"Temporary"Meaning and scope:Word "temporary" means that which lasts for a limited time only as distinguished from that which is perpetual or indefinite in duration, opposite of permanent. (b) Industrial dispute Termination of servicesReinstatementGrievance petition filed by employees against their unceremonious termination of services, was resisted by employers on ground that employment of employees was temporaryEmployees were in service, of employers for more than a decade without any breakEmployees were detailed on installation duties in establishment which by all means was a work of permanent natureEmployees in circumstances were permanent workmen and their services could not be terminated without any letter of termination. Pakistan International Airlines v. Sindh Labour Court No. 5 and others PLD 1980 SC 323; Allah Ditta v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal and another PLD 1985 Lah. 407; Pakistan International Airlines v. Bashir Ahmed 1982 PLC 436 and Government Transport Service v. Zaheeruddin Babar 1986 PLC 567 rel: DECISION The circumstances in which these two appeals against the common order of the Labour Court No. l Karachi allowing the two petitions filed by the petitioner under section 25-A; IRO have arisen, are as follows: It was alleged by the petitioner that he had joined the respondent establishment in the year 1981 and was detailed in installation duties. However, he was being paid at the end of the month on daily wages basis without any allowances and without any other facilities as admissible to their permanent employees. 2. The petitioner had been beseeching the respondent to redress his grievances, and having failed to get their ears had sent a grievance notice on the 30th of April 1988. The same was not replied to. He was therefore constrained to file the petition with the prayer that he be treated by the respondent as a permanent workman from the day he had joined their service, and be assigned GradeIV with all the admissible allowances to which a permanent workman is entitled. 3. It is further, alleged that the above-said grievance petition was filed before the Labour Court in the month of June 1988 and the notice…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492