Case Details

Citation(s)
1963 SLG 371 1963 SLD 371 (1963) 50 ITR 467
Mysore High Court
IT REFERENCE CASE No. 15 OF 1961, JUNE 20, 1962
K.S. HEGDE AND AHMED ALI KHAN, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Gowli Buddanna

v.

Commissioner of INCOME TAX

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 66(1)

JUDGMENT This case raises a somewhat interesting question of law. At the instance of the assessee, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Madras Bench) has referred to this court under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, to be referred to hereinafter as the Act, the following questions of law, They are: "(i)Whether a sole male surviving coparcener of the Hindu joint family, his widowed mother and sisters constitute a Hindu undivided family within the meaning of the Income-tax Act ? (ii)Whether the assessment of the income in the hands of the Hindu undivided family was correct ? (iii)Whether the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was entitled to correct the status ?" Sri K. Srinivasan, learned counsel for the assessee, did not press question No. 3 and, therefore, it is not necessary for us to pronounce on the same. The material facts as set out in the statement of the case submitted by the Tribunal are as follows : One Gowli Buddappa and his brother's son, Gowli Buddanna (subsequently adopted as son of the former) were the coparceners of a Hindu undivided family. Till the death of Buddappa, their undivided Hindu family was assessed to income-tax. Gowli Buddappa died on July 9, 1952, leaving behind him his wife, three daughters, his adopted son and his daughter-in-law (wife of Buddanna). The Income-tax Officer, Raichur, assessed the assessee for the assessment year 1951-52 (accounting year ended on November 8, 1960) "as the successor to Buddappa with the status of a Hindu undivided family". The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax who repelled the contention of the assessee as regards his status. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner also held that the Income-tax Officer had committed a mistake in treating Buddanna as the successor of Buddappa. The assessee being dissatisfied with the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner appealed to the Income-tax Tribunal. The Tribunal also rejected his contention but accepted his prayer to refer the afore-mentioned questions of law to this court for its opinion. Under section 3 of the Indian Income-tax Act, the liability to pay tax is charged not only on the income of Hindu…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492