| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1994 SLG 1196 1994 SLD 1196 1994 CLC 399 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 167-R of 1990, decided on 13th April, 1993.
RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, J
Ch. Hafeez Ahmad for Petitioner. Hamid Ali Mirza and Khan Muhammad Bajwa for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 167-R of 1990, decided on 13th April, 1993.
RAJA AFRASIAB KHAN, J
Ch. Hafeez Ahmad for Petitioner. Hamid Ali Mirza and Khan Muhammad Bajwa for
Respondents.
Munshi JAN MUHMMAD
VS
ADDITIONAL D.C. (G) and others
Law:
Section:
Settlement Scheme (Revised) No. VIII--- ---- Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Transfer of property--Constitutional jurisdiction; exercise of---Property in dispute was divided and transferred to both parties who were in physical possession of property---Both parties having fairly and justly been accommodated by order of Authority same could not be interfered with when no legal infirmity, much less jurisdictional defect, had been pointed out in such order. Messrs Talib Hussain Noor Hussain v. Muhammad Hussain Siddiqi 1968 SCMR 1316; Mian Zahoor Ahmad v. Mst. Khurshid Ishrat and others 1988 MLD 1966; Mst. Shah Jahan Begum v. Mst. Shabbir Fatima and another PLD 1991 SC 614 and Mst. Shahzada Begum v. Ahmad Kamal and others PLD 1991 SC 617 ref. JUDGMENT The petitioner, Munshi Jan Muhammad and contesting respondents Muhammad Sharif, Ghulab Din, Muhammad Sadiq and Mst. Sardar Begum are displaced persons from the occupied part of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The admitted position is that both the parties are in the physical possession of House No.11/106, Pala Shah Gate, Sialkot City. The property in question was divided and transferred to the respective parties by the learned Additional Commissioner (G)/Notified Officer, Sialkot vide his order dated 25-4-1990. It was observed by the learned Notified Officer that the contesting respondents filed their forms under Settlement Scheme No.R. SS VIII in October, 1973 for the transfer of the property in question to them. These forms were accepted by the learned Notified Officer and the property in their possession was ordered to be transferred to them. The remaining part of the house in question was allowed to remain in possession of the petitioner as its Transferee. This order has been assailed by the petitioner through this petition. 2. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the whole house as one unit was transferred by the competent authority to the petitioner. He submits that the part of the house being transferred to the contesting respondents is, as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492